2021
DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2021.1881614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weber test accuracy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: which frequency is best?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each patient was instructed to report in which ear the vibrating sound was heard louder. The result was considered positive when the sound was lateralized to the nonaffected ear.‬ The smartphone-based vibration test has been validated for SSNHL and found to be in high agreement with the traditional tuning fork at a frequency of 512 Hz, which is the most sensitive frequency for detecting SSNHL …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each patient was instructed to report in which ear the vibrating sound was heard louder. The result was considered positive when the sound was lateralized to the nonaffected ear.‬ The smartphone-based vibration test has been validated for SSNHL and found to be in high agreement with the traditional tuning fork at a frequency of 512 Hz, which is the most sensitive frequency for detecting SSNHL …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smartphone-based vibration test has been validated for SSNHL and found to be in high agreement with the traditional tuning fork at a frequency of 512 Hz, 11 which is the most sensitive frequency for detecting SSNHL. 13 uHear App-Based Audiometry In a recent review, 44 unique apps for hearing assessment were identified on the application stores. 14 Most of them were free, and included a hearing threshold test.…”
Section: The Smartphone-based Vibration Weber Testmentioning
confidence: 99%