2022
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight loss between glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and bariatric surgery in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Objective Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists recently demonstrated 15% to 20% weight loss in adults with obesity, a range which has previously been achieved only with bariatric surgery. This systematic review and meta‐analysis compares weight loss between GLP‐1 receptor agonists and bariatric surgery. Methods The databases MEDLINE, MEDLINE In‐Process, MEDLINE Epubs Ahead of Print, Embase Classic + Embase (OvidSP), and Cochrane (Wiley) were searched from inception to April 21, 2021, for randomize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a relevant body of evidence is available for the comparison of RYGB with SG, showing a greater efficacy of gastric bypass on glycaemic and other metabolic endpoints. This confirms the results of previous meta‐analyses reporting a greater efficacy of RYGB than SG for glycaemic control, lipid profile and BMI 3–5,7,75 . Fewer trials compared other surgical interventions, showing that malabsorptive techniques are more effective than restrictive interventions, with a comparable tolerability and safety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, a relevant body of evidence is available for the comparison of RYGB with SG, showing a greater efficacy of gastric bypass on glycaemic and other metabolic endpoints. This confirms the results of previous meta‐analyses reporting a greater efficacy of RYGB than SG for glycaemic control, lipid profile and BMI 3–5,7,75 . Fewer trials compared other surgical interventions, showing that malabsorptive techniques are more effective than restrictive interventions, with a comparable tolerability and safety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, in many available trials, the treatments used in the comparator arm did not include newer and more effective treatments, such as glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP1) receptor agonists and dual GLP1‐gastric inhibitory polypeptide agonists 72–74 . Notably, a recent meta‐analysis comparing surgery with GLP1 receptor agonists showed greater efficacy of MBS on BW, but less on glycaemic control 75 . In addition, the reduction of HbA1c in MBS arms versus controls appeared to be smaller in trials with a longer duration, posing some concerns about the actual durability of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, in the obesity population, GLP-1RAs appear as an efficacious and safe treatment option; however, in cases of morbid obesity, they seem to be inferior to bariatric surgery, which remains the treatment of choice [ 38 ]. However, since subjects with psychotic disorders have increased cardiovascular risk compared to healthy controls [ 6 ], while they also encounter substantial disparities in terms of CVD screening and treatment [ 39 ], it seems that GLP-1RAs appear as a reasonable treatment option, aiming at improving the cardio-metabolic health of those patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Although bariatric surgery has been found to confer greater weight loss than GLP-1 receptor agonists, the improvements in glycaemia are similar. 24 Sustained benefit requires ongoing medication use.…”
Section: Pharmacological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%