2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WEPPcloud: An online watershed-scale hydrologic modeling tool. Part II. Model performance assessment and applications to forest management and wildfires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrologic simulations were performed with the WEPPcloud interface [ 7 , 8 ] for 28 relatively undisturbed watersheds in the U.S. Pacific Northwest (Lake Tahoe basin, CA/NV; Bull Run Watershed, OR; Cedar River and Taylor Creek, WA, and two watersheds in Mica Creek Experimental Watershed, ID) and compared model outputs such as streamflow, sediment and phosphorus yield to observed data recorded at USGS gaging stations and recorded with flumes ( Table 1 ; [1] ). Each model run (including data input and output) can be viewed either online by accessing the web links in Table 1 or by accessing the zipped folders stored in the HydroShare repository.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hydrologic simulations were performed with the WEPPcloud interface [ 7 , 8 ] for 28 relatively undisturbed watersheds in the U.S. Pacific Northwest (Lake Tahoe basin, CA/NV; Bull Run Watershed, OR; Cedar River and Taylor Creek, WA, and two watersheds in Mica Creek Experimental Watershed, ID) and compared model outputs such as streamflow, sediment and phosphorus yield to observed data recorded at USGS gaging stations and recorded with flumes ( Table 1 ; [1] ). Each model run (including data input and output) can be viewed either online by accessing the web links in Table 1 or by accessing the zipped folders stored in the HydroShare repository.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 ). Goodness-of-fit statistics (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency, the Kling-Gupta efficiency, and percent bias) and additional graphs can be found in [1] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A part of the soil components of RRED were incorporated into the online USDA Forest Service WEPP interfaces. The online tools allow for even easier modeling access (Robichaud et al, 2019;Lew et al, 2022;Dobre et al, 2022; https://wepp1.nkn.uidaho.edu/weppcloud/). Efforts are ongoing to improve both accessibility and accuracy of post-fire models and datasets used to assess risks from post-fire flooding and erosion.…”
Section: Property Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%