2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wh – Question answering in children with intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no statistically significant relationship between wh‐questions alone and grade level equivalent scores, suggesting that responses to wh‐questions were not useful in discriminating between participants with higher and lower comprehension abilities. This is not surprising given that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities often struggle to understand wh‐questions (Sanders & Erickson, 2018), and it provides important information about the types of items to use when assessing text comprehension among individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no statistically significant relationship between wh‐questions alone and grade level equivalent scores, suggesting that responses to wh‐questions were not useful in discriminating between participants with higher and lower comprehension abilities. This is not surprising given that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities often struggle to understand wh‐questions (Sanders & Erickson, 2018), and it provides important information about the types of items to use when assessing text comprehension among individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the current research was to address this gap by investigating how well adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities could read and understand the CDC COVID‐19 guidance documents produced in compliance with the MTC Guidelines. Since previous research has demonstrated that many individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities struggle to understand and answer wh‐questions (Sanders & Erickson, 2018), different measures of comprehension (i.e., item‐types) were used in addition to wh‐questions. Specifically, the study focused on adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who read at or below the third‐grade reading level and explored the relationship between level of comprehension and both intrinsic (i.e., participants' reading levels) and external (i.e., item‐type; presence vs. absence of real pictures) factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen a listening comprehension intervention because early childhood education on communicative speech skills has been shown to be one of the most important factors for positive long-term quality of life for individuals with ASD [26,27]. Specifically, the ability to answer whquestions is one of the most important communicative skills in early childhood education [28]. The robotmediated intervention consists of a robot-mediator reading passages from electronic books (e-books) and asking the child wh-questions with the aim of fading prompts until the child can independently as well as correctly answer the wh-questions.…”
Section: Robot-mediated Listening Comprehension Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%