2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
310
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
310
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Bunlar arasında geçerlilik, güvenilirlik ve değişime yanıt yönünden valide edilen ve performansının iyi olduğu kabul edilen SCORAD indeksi (Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis Index) çocuklarda klinik çalışmalarda ve günlük pratikte sık kullanılır (10).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Bunlar arasında geçerlilik, güvenilirlik ve değişime yanıt yönünden valide edilen ve performansının iyi olduğu kabul edilen SCORAD indeksi (Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis Index) çocuklarda klinik çalışmalarda ve günlük pratikte sık kullanılır (10).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Przeprowadzono wiele badań nad walidacją tej skali i uznano ją za wiarygodne narzędzie zarówno w badaniach klinicznych, jak i w codziennej praktyce klinicznej [9,10,14,15]. SCORAD wykazuje wysoką korelację z ogólną oceną nasilenia choroby [10] oraz EASI [9].…”
Section: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (Scorad)unclassified
“…Investigators' Global Atopic Dermatitis Assessment), która określa nasilenie choroby od braku zmian do bardzo ciężkiego i zawiera szczegółowo opisane zasady, jak oceniać poszczególne objawy dla każdej z kategorii nasilenia choroby [23]. Skala ta nie jest powszechnie stosowana i potrzeba dalszych badań nad oceną jej wiarygodności [14].…”
Section: Investigators' Global Assessment (Iga)unclassified
“…Although no previous studies have examined incident case definitions for eczema, our results are consistent with the larger problem of the lack of standardised disease outcome measures in eczema research. For example, Schmitt et al 175 found 20 different scoring systems for measuring the severity of eczema. Chamlin et al 78 found 30 different definitions for defining an individual as high risk for DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04180 PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016 VOL.…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…175,299 Because these instruments assess different aspects of AE in different ways, trials cannot be readily compared and meta-analyses are often not possible. Consequently, clinical decision-making is limited by a lack of standardisation and validation of outcome measures.…”
Section: Background To the Harmonising Outcome Measures For Eczema Prmentioning
confidence: 99%