2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the predictive factors leading to ureteral obstruction following endoscopic correction of VUR in the pediatric population?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment involved temporary ureteral stenting in one patient and ureteral reimplantation in the other. This is consistent with other series reporting post-operative ureteral obstruction rates of 0.5–1.05% after endoscopic injection (15, 17, 39). Patients in these series presented between 1 day and 49 months after surgery and were treated with ureteral stenting or reimplantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Treatment involved temporary ureteral stenting in one patient and ureteral reimplantation in the other. This is consistent with other series reporting post-operative ureteral obstruction rates of 0.5–1.05% after endoscopic injection (15, 17, 39). Patients in these series presented between 1 day and 49 months after surgery and were treated with ureteral stenting or reimplantation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Patients in these series presented between 1 day and 49 months after surgery and were treated with ureteral stenting or reimplantation. High-grade VUR, obstructed/refluxing megaureter, inflamed urothelium, and secondary VUR have been associated with ureteral obstruction (17, 39). As shown here and elsewhere (16, 17), ureteral obstruction is a rare complication of endoscopic injection that may present years after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible risk factors, such as a preoperative bladder mucosal inflammation, the injection of greater volume and repeat injection were mentioned by several researchers but more investigation is warranted. 3 , 5 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demgegenüber stehen Studien mit konsequenten strukturierten Nachuntersuchungen, die eine Infektionsrate von 23 %, eine postoperative Komplikationsrate von 10 % und das Wiederauftreten eines Refluxes im Langzeitverlauf nach initial erfolgreicher Unterspritzung von 20 % beschreiben [10,16]. Während das verwendete Material für die Unterspritzung eher weniger Einfluss auf die Ergebnisse und die Komplikationen zu haben scheint, wirken sich neben einem hohen Refluxgrad v. a. niedriges Alter und eine vorausgegangene nicht erfolgreiche Behandlung ungünstig auf den Behandlungserfolg aus [19,20].…”
Section: Alternativen Zur Chemoprophylaxeunclassified