2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.00930
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Can Possibly Go Wrong?

Harald W. Griesshammer

Abstract: Often attributed to Gell-Mann, the origin is lost in words spoken long before 1956 [5]. 2 In compliance with the Zeroth Theorem of the History of Science, the phrase's likely first appearance in print is a 1866 article by De Morgan [7], well before the famed Murphy was even born.3 Originally a put-down, this dictum was embraced by EFT advocates early on; cf. e.g.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Can the power counting of chiral EFT be made rigorous within a non-perturbative many-body calculation (see, e.g., [258][259][260][261] and references therein)? As an example, consider the following issue: In the usual Weinberg power counting, chiral EFT amplitudes are iterated to all orders to generate nuclear potentials because the πN coupling is not perturbative.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Can the power counting of chiral EFT be made rigorous within a non-perturbative many-body calculation (see, e.g., [258][259][260][261] and references therein)? As an example, consider the following issue: In the usual Weinberg power counting, chiral EFT amplitudes are iterated to all orders to generate nuclear potentials because the πN coupling is not perturbative.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%