What Drives Different Governance Modes and Marketization Performance for Collective Commercial Construction Land in Rural China?

Chen, Zhun; Zhuo, Yuefei; Li, Guan; Zhang, Xu

doi:10.3390/land10030319

Cited by 8 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Theoretical analysis finds that the marketization of collective commercial construction land changes the status quo that only state-owned construction land can attract investment and develop industries, which realize rural land value and share more land benefits with farmers and consequently boost rural industrial revitalization and farmers' affluence (Yan et al, 2021). From the perspective of transaction costs, Chen et al (2021) explore the effect of the marketization of collective commercial construction land on promoting rural industry development and village collective income under different governance structures. Some studies, on the other hand, use village cases from the perspectives of land marketization and property rights conversion to reveal the positive effects of capital resources on the countryside and urban-rural factor flows on rural development and gentrification (Kan, 2021).…”

Section: The Relations Between Rural Land Governance and Rural Revita...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From the perspective of transaction costs, Chen et al. (2021) explore the effect of the marketization of collective commercial construction land on promoting rural industry development and village collective income under different governance structures. Some studies, on the other hand, use village cases from the perspectives of land marketization and property rights conversion to reveal the positive effects of capital resources on the countryside and urban‒rural factor flows on rural development and gentrification (Kan, 2021).…”

Section: Theoretical Basis For Analysing Land Self‐organization For R...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

Zhou,

Luo,

Zhang

2023

Growth and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As land is one of the most important production factors in rural areas, it is becoming an important challenge for rural revitalization strategy to realize land value and promote the socioeconomic development of villages through the collective action of self‐organized collective land use. Various studies have discussed the relationships among land governance, rural revitalization and self‐organization, but few studies have focused on village cadres' roles and village rules. This paper aims to establish an analytical framework to explore these two operating mechanisms of self‐organization in collective land use. Two villages in eastern China and one village in western China are selected as typical cases to demonstrate how collective land use is self‐organized by village cadres' roles and village rules. The results indicate that village cadres play roles in the entrepreneurial spirit and resource access capacity to promote village economic and social development. In the utilization of collective land for farmers to live in peace and work happily, the configuration of rules at the village level to regulate the behaviour of villagers is a qualification on demand and “see who can take part”, cost sharing and benefit sharing, graduated sanction and supervision. The analysis in this article may provide an understanding of the mechanism driving the promotion and improvement of land self‐organization, which has important policy implications for China and other developing countries adopting this mode to promote regional economic development in rural areas.

show abstract

Section: The Relations Between Rural Land Governance and Rural Revita...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Basis For Analysing Land Self‐organization For R...mentioning

confidence: 99%

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

Zhou,

Luo,

Zhang

2023

Growth and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Y. Li’s (2009) research on farmers in Guangdong Province posits that in market transactions, the farmland transfer contract is not notarized, and the intervention of village cadres in farmland transfer greatly increases the uncertainty of farmers’ behavior in farmland transfer(Hu et al, 2021), which in turn increases transaction costs. Some scholars found that the transaction costs of farmers’ search for information, price negotiation and contract signing (Z. Chen, Zhuo, et al, 2021), supervision, and performance have a significant negative impact on the transfer of farmland.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some scholars found that the transaction costs of farmers' search for information, price negotiation and contract signing (Z. Chen, Zhuo, et al, 2021), supervision, and performance have a significant negative impact on the transfer of farmland. Studying farmland transfer and contract selection from the perspective of transaction costs is a recent academic effort (J.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences of Farmland Transfer Transaction Costs on Contract Choices from the Perspective of Differential Order Governance: Based on a Survey of Farmers in Henan Province

Wang,

Wen

et al. 2024

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the heterogeneous situation of heterogeneity of farmland circulation entities, transaction costs are the key factors to optimize the selection of circulation contracts, and reducing transaction costs is an important realization path to promote farmland circulation in a reasonable and orderly manner and accelerate the process of agricultural modernization. Based on the survey data of 814 farming households in Henan Province, this study explores the transaction costs on contract selection based on the differential order governance. The results show that (a) in the transfer of farmland, farmers’ choice of contracts is restricted by their degree of association with the transaction entity, which is the result of differential order governance. (b) The influence of differential order governance on the selection of transfer contracts is constrained by the governance context. Farmers tend to choose formal written contracts in the context of weak ties governance but choose verbal or informal contracts under strong relationship governance. (c) The impact of transaction costs on the selection of farmland transfer contracts is constrained by the three-stage scenarios as before, during, and after the transaction. In different transaction stages, the higher the transaction costs are, the more likely farmers are to choose a formal written contract. The findings show the importance of the rules of human relations in the society of acquaintances in saving transaction costs. The importance of the formal system and informal institutions, such as trust and reputation, and avoiding one-size-fits-all suggestions should be involved in the formulation and implementation of farmland transfer policies.

show abstract

“…Among them is the American ACSI model, which has been chosen by an increasing number of researchers in the field of research on measuring satisfaction in China for its strengths in combining the most representative of customer satisfaction theories, namely: the expectation-difference theory, perceived performance theory, and equity theory [19,20]. Most of the existing studies on the market entry of collective-owned commercial construction land focus on the development of legal systems [21,22], the improvement of the value-added revenue distribution system [23,24], and the construction of a unified urban-rural land market [25], which all focus on the macro-level of the legal system and planning. This is not conducive to the accurate judgement and identification of farmers' true feelings towards the market entry of collective-owned land and its influencing factors, and it is not possible to obtain the effect of the implementation of policy on the ground.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is Farmers’ Level of Satisfaction under China’s Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?

Liu

Wang

2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The entry of collective-owned commercial construction land into the market is a major reform of China’s land management system, which will help promote the appreciation of rural land, establish a unified urban and rural construction land market, and help rural revitalisation and urban–rural integrated development. Based on the classic customer satisfaction index model, this study constructs a satisfaction model for farmers who enter the market with collective-owned commercial construction land. Farmers’ satisfaction is measured by 7 latent variables and the corresponding 22 observed variables, forming a causal chain containing 13 pairs of interactions. Taking as an example Dazu District of Chongqing City, one of the pilot areas where China’s collective-owned commercial construction land has come on the market, AMOS statistical analysis software is used to test the hypotheses. The research results show that: farmers’ information awareness has the greatest impact on farmers’ satisfaction; the higher farmers’ perceived quality is, the more they can improve their satisfaction; there is a significant relationship between farmers’ satisfaction, farmers’ complaints and farmers’ trust; and the three are closely related. Finally, based on the research results, we try to put forward targeted policy suggestions in order to provide a useful reference for government to push for the promotion of the collective-owned commercial construction land marketisation in other rural areas of China and its future improvement.

show abstract

What Drives Different Governance Modes and Marketization Performance for Collective Commercial Construction Land in Rural China?

Cited by 8 publications

References 44 publications

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

How do China's villages self‐organize collective land use under the background of rural revitalization? A multi‐case study in Zhejiang, Fujian and Guizhou provinces

Influences of Farmland Transfer Transaction Costs on Contract Choices from the Perspective of Differential Order Governance: Based on a Survey of Farmers in Henan Province

What Is Farmers’ Level of Satisfaction under China’s Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About