This essay analyzes A Cultural Object, an installation made by the Jamaican artist Dawn Scott in 1985, in order to discuss how institutional practices and criticism are framed in contemporary Caribbean art. Through an examination of A Cultural Object's afterlife in the space of the National Gallery of Jamaica, I attempt to examine the relation between the agencies of the museum, the artist, the spectators, and the installation. In so doing, the text intends to reconsider the potential of unpredictable human and nonhuman relations within Caribbean institutional and cultural spaces.Borrowing from these debates and adopting Williams' active, situated notion of criticism, this article examines some of the ghostly presences and pitfalls in Caribbean critical and curatorial practices and the thinking surrounding them. My main concern is with challenging the primacy of discourse in the configuration of national and regional histories and understandings of artistic practice. In order to question that tendency, I will suggest that there is much to be learned from spectatorship and from artworks themselves. I will analyze A Cultural Object, the installation that the Jamaican artist Dawn Scott created in 1985 for the celebrated exhibition Six Options: Gallery Space Revisited, which took place at the National Gallery of Jamaica. Scott's project consisted of a complex labyrinth formed by zinc sheets and labeled "A Cultural Zone." The labyrinth's walls were covered with a disjointed mixture of street culture paraphernalia referring to religion, dancehall, consumer culture, and garrison politics, 1 centering on a derelict scenario presided over by the supine body of a homeless person. A Cultural Object is said to have translated the atmosphere of Kingston streets within the space of the museum (Poupeye, 1985), sharing the realism and pessimism of the 1980s, which followed the socialist government of Michael Manley. 2 From this standpoint, the project's main asset is based on the shock it provokes in the "uptown" visitor of the National Gallery. 3 However, I will argue that Scott's installation is somehow subjected to a contradictory valence: on one hand, it constitutes a cornerstone in the process of introducing popular culture within the Jamaican national canon. On the other hand, it emerges as a gesture orchestrated by the very institution it sought to criticize.A Cultural Object arose from a very particular context and temporality. However, as it also poses poignant and timely questions to our understanding of creative agency and institutionalism in the present. Since its creation, the installation became a popular referent, attracting the attention of several generations and developing a sort of afterlife. As we will see, this afterlife is far from being unproblematic. In this article, I maintain that there is an "unruly" potential in Scott's installation. This potential relates its capacity of fleeing institutional normality and demanding alternative emotional responses. The "unruliness" of A Cultural Object emerges as an ...