2017
DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the Best Setting for Receiving Dialysis Vascular access Repair and Maintenance Services?

Abstract: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLEangioplasties performed on AVF (3). Site of service has also changed progressively toward the freestanding outpatient facility (FOC) dedicated to DVA from hospital outpatient departments (HOPD). In the FOC, fluoroscopically guided, endovascular treatments are being performed, utilizing sedation/ analgesia in an outpatient environment primarily by interventional nephrologists. Questions arise about their effectiveness, safety, quality, and economy.In a previous study (4), based on Medic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we compared endoAVF costs with SAVF costs, there are limited studies within the SAVF literature comparing different AVF anastomotic techniques and associated cost of maintenance with SAVF (24). El-Gamil et al used USRDS to compare vascular access costs in freestanding office-based centers with the hospital outpatient department, but they combined SAVF and AVG outcomes, so the results can not be compared with the present study (25,26). Another recent study, by Al-Balas et al, quantified intervention rates and costs by access type in incident patients starting dialysis with a CVC and found 2.48 procedures per PY were needed to mature and maintain a surgical AVF with a median first year cost of $16,602 (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although we compared endoAVF costs with SAVF costs, there are limited studies within the SAVF literature comparing different AVF anastomotic techniques and associated cost of maintenance with SAVF (24). El-Gamil et al used USRDS to compare vascular access costs in freestanding office-based centers with the hospital outpatient department, but they combined SAVF and AVG outcomes, so the results can not be compared with the present study (25,26). Another recent study, by Al-Balas et al, quantified intervention rates and costs by access type in incident patients starting dialysis with a CVC and found 2.48 procedures per PY were needed to mature and maintain a surgical AVF with a median first year cost of $16,602 (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the United States of America (USA), AVF angioplasties are commonly performed by nephrologists in specialized outpatient centers, with lower complication rates, shorter hospital stay, lower costs, and fewer infection episodes compared to inpatient treatment. However, in developing countries, most nephrologists are not trained to perform this type of interventional procedure, which might affect AV outcomes [3][4][5][6] . An important obstacle in these countries and in low-resource settings is the lack of training in endovascular procedures for nephrologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%