2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest Radiography, Ultrasound, and Computed Tomography for COVID-19?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review published in 2022 identified 51 studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in symptomatic patients with suspected COVID-19. It found that CXR, LUS, and chest CT all had moderate sensitivity (80.6%, 86.4%, and 87.9%, respectively), with lower specificity for LUS (54.6%, vs. 71.5% of CXR and 80% of CT) [65]. In a retrospective study on patients admitted to the ED, CT showed better performance for COVID-19 diagnosis when compared to LUS (sensitivity and specificity for CT 90-95% and 43-69% vs. 94-93% and 7-31% for LUS, respectively) [66].…”
Section: Lung Ultrasounds (Lus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review published in 2022 identified 51 studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in symptomatic patients with suspected COVID-19. It found that CXR, LUS, and chest CT all had moderate sensitivity (80.6%, 86.4%, and 87.9%, respectively), with lower specificity for LUS (54.6%, vs. 71.5% of CXR and 80% of CT) [65]. In a retrospective study on patients admitted to the ED, CT showed better performance for COVID-19 diagnosis when compared to LUS (sensitivity and specificity for CT 90-95% and 43-69% vs. 94-93% and 7-31% for LUS, respectively) [66].…”
Section: Lung Ultrasounds (Lus)mentioning
confidence: 99%