What Outcomes are Important for Gout Patients? In-Depth Qualitative Research into the Gout Patient Experience to Determine Optimal Endpoints for Evaluating Therapeutic Interventions

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesCharacterized by sudden onset of severe joint pain, swelling, redness, and tenderness to touch, gout ‘flare ups’ have a substantial impact on quality of life (QoL). This research employed a patient-centered approach to explore the symptoms and impacts of gout, and assess the content validity of existing patient-reported outcomes (PROs).MethodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 30 US gout patients (non-tophaceous: n = 20, tophaceous: n = 10) and five expert rheumatologists. Each interview included both concept elicitation (CE) questioning to learn about the patient experience and cognitive debriefing to assess the content validity of three PRO instruments (HAQ-DI, GAQ, and TIQ-20). Nine of the patients provided further real-time qualitative data through a smart phone application. All qualitative data were subject to thematic analysis using Atlas.ti. Two patient advisors and three expert clinicians were engaged as advisors at key stages throughout the research.ResultsInterview and real-time data identified the same core symptoms and proximal impact concepts. Severe pain (typically in joints of extremities) was described as the cardinal symptom, often accompanied by swelling, redness, heat, sensitivity to touch, and stiffness. Domains of QoL impacted included physical functioning, sleep, daily activities, and work. The PRO instruments were generally well-understood by patients, but each included items with questionable relevance to at least some of the sample, dependent on the specific joints affected.ConclusionsGout patients experience severe pain in affected joints, resulting in substantial limitations in physical functioning. Both the HAQ-DI and the TIQ-20 are useful for specific research purposes in the gout population, although modifications are recommended.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0184-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The burden of disease in pyruvate kinase deficiency: Patients’ perception of the impact on health‐related quality of life

“…28 Whether the cognitive issues reported by the participants in this study are attributable to age, anemia, 29 The sample size used for this study is typical of concept elicitation interview studies. 22,30,31 Achievement of conceptual saturation in this study indicates that the sample size was sufficient to characterize the burden of PK deficiency from the perspective of patients. It also indicates that it is unlikely any comorbidities or misdiagnoses were the cause of concepts such as jaundice that were reported and also appear in other conditions.…”

Australian patient perspectives on the impact of gout

“…These findings are consistent with international studies. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Regarding specific findings, the impacts of pain and immobility reported by participants was substantial, as it prevented them from completing necessary work tasks and household chores. and how others perceived their illness.…”

“…18 In international studies, financial and occupational concerns were identified by patients with gout as significant impacts. 13,14,[18][19][20] Interestingly, the presented data suggest that in Australia, the financial burden of gout was not a major concern.…”

‘Man up’: Medical students’ perceptions of gender and learning in clinical practice: A qualitative study

“…A further reason for adopting these dual methods is that some of the students in our population were preparing for examinations, on placements in the UK or on elective placements overseas, which meant that they would not be available for interview at the time the study was conducted. Other studies have shown that qualitative data obtained from written accounts or electronically through a smartphone application can be successfully integrated with interview data to generate novel insights into aspects of health care . Therefore, our approach to data collection was appropriate as it took into account the sensitivity relating to gender identity and afforded students the opportunity to participate in the study as they saw fit irrespective of where they were in their studies.…”