2020
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1833099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the strong rationalist tradition holds that a belief must be able to rationally prove truth claims to everyone to be accepted. Attempts are needed to bridge the two bioethical perspectives to reach an agreement so that the former can contribute to the second or vice versa (Gómez, 2020). The application of secular bioethics as an epistemic attitude complemented by religious inputs can lead to neglecting other structural conditions, such as publication, transparency, and rationality, that enable bioethical debates (Erduran et al, 2019).…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the strong rationalist tradition holds that a belief must be able to rationally prove truth claims to everyone to be accepted. Attempts are needed to bridge the two bioethical perspectives to reach an agreement so that the former can contribute to the second or vice versa (Gómez, 2020). The application of secular bioethics as an epistemic attitude complemented by religious inputs can lead to neglecting other structural conditions, such as publication, transparency, and rationality, that enable bioethical debates (Erduran et al, 2019).…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%