The Business Value of IT 2008
DOI: 10.1201/9781420064759.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Should The Business Expect From It?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Finally, the experimental design quality of each study included in this research was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. 41 SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), 32 R version 3.5 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria), 42 and STATA version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) 43 were used for all analyses. Significance was set to P < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Finally, the experimental design quality of each study included in this research was evaluated using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. 41 SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), 32 R version 3.5 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria), 42 and STATA version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) 43 were used for all analyses. Significance was set to P < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to suggestions by Kontopantelis & Reeves (2010), the "metaan" package was applied in these analyses (Kontopantelis & Reeves, 2010). The random-effects models incorporated an estimation of heterogeneity in the weighting (Harris et al, 2008), as has been suggested in recent literature (Kontopantelis & Reeves, 2010;Veroniki et al, 2019). The profile-likelihood approach in the "metaan" package was chosen as a more advanced version of random-effects model, while incorporating both the maximum likelihood and the DerSimonian-Laird approaches (Kontopantelis & Reeves, 2010).…”
Section: Meta-analysis and Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%