2013
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2013/5985.3482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Type of Lectures Students Want? - A Reaction Evaluation of Dental Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…using technology improves interactions between students and lecturers, and students' academic performance (d 'Inverno, Davis, & White, 2003;Halloran, 1995;Poirier & Feldman, 2007;Rehman, Afzal, & Kamran, 2013). Concise delivery of the subject content, coupled with active students' engagement and interactions, are deemed supportive of students' learning efforts (Roopa, Bagavad Geetha, Rani, & Chacko, 2013;Sarwar, Razzaq, & Saeed, 2014). Students demonstrated positive perceptions for lecture classes that encourage them to actively participate and interact (Chilwant, 2012;Rehman, Afzal, & Kamran, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using technology improves interactions between students and lecturers, and students' academic performance (d 'Inverno, Davis, & White, 2003;Halloran, 1995;Poirier & Feldman, 2007;Rehman, Afzal, & Kamran, 2013). Concise delivery of the subject content, coupled with active students' engagement and interactions, are deemed supportive of students' learning efforts (Roopa, Bagavad Geetha, Rani, & Chacko, 2013;Sarwar, Razzaq, & Saeed, 2014). Students demonstrated positive perceptions for lecture classes that encourage them to actively participate and interact (Chilwant, 2012;Rehman, Afzal, & Kamran, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those of the millennial generation-who have grown up with a constant connection to the entire world, and with technology literally at their fingertips-are accustomed to the incorporation of technology into the learning environment, and thus may be even more inclined to respond well to the use of hands-on experience, interaction, and small group activities. 25,26 In the 1970s, one study showed that the average engagement of medical students peaked 15 minutes into formal lectures, and rapidly declined after that. 27 In the modern era, attention likely peaks much earlier, and wanes much faster, as has been our experience with a series of brief (shorter than 15 minutes) video-based lectures on the basics of EEG.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Traditional Lecture Format In Neurology Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So they concluded that interactive lectures were more useful than traditional lectures. [6] A comparative study between structured interactive lectures and conventional lectures was conducted by Chilwant K.S et al of SAIMS Medical College, Indore, India. [8] The mean scores of multiple choice post tests were not statistically significant among the two groups.…”
Section: Srinivasan Roopa Et Al Concluded Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Researches comparing traditional and interactive lectures in medical education have shown inconclusive data regarding the knowledge gain and preference of lecture methods. [3][4][5][6][7][8] This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of interactive lecture and traditional lecture for teaching Biochemistry topics to first year medical students of Government Medical College, Idukki.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%