2022
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What would it take to establish a take‐back scheme for fishing gear? Insights from a comparative analysis of fishing gear and beverage containers

Abstract: What would it take to establish a take-back scheme for fishing gear? Insights from a comparative analysis of fishing gear and beverage containers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovation ecosystems also support a diagnosis of the strengths and shortcomings of an ecosystem in light of its professed purposes (as illustrated in Nogueira et al, 2022). Innovation ecosystems are about value creation (Gomes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Market Formation and Innovation Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Innovation ecosystems also support a diagnosis of the strengths and shortcomings of an ecosystem in light of its professed purposes (as illustrated in Nogueira et al, 2022). Innovation ecosystems are about value creation (Gomes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Market Formation and Innovation Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an extensive coast of cultural and economic significance, marine litter presents one of the key waste concerns in Norway. Discarded fishing gear has long been a challenge for both the waste companies and the seafood industry, due to the lack of sufficient and environmentally friendly solutions for their recycling and disposal (Nogueira et al, 2022). Nofir is a company that implements a recycling scheme for discarded gear from fisheries and aquaculture.…”
Section: Upcycling Of Discarded Fishing Gearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Nogueira et al. (2022) analyze the feasibility of implementing take‐back schemes for fishing gears, comparable to that of beverage containers. A third study by Szostek and colleagues (2022) presents a quantitative method to determine how effective different fishing management scenarios (e.g., gear modification or substitution, fishing effort…) are in terms of mitigating the ecological effects linked to the seabed‐penetrating fishing gear.…”
Section: Fishing and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, they present an analytic framework to describe fishing gear use in the context of the environmental impacts linked to fishing activities in order to further understand how industrial fishing can impact the oceans through gear use and loss. In contrast, Nogueira et al (2022) analyze the feasibility of implementing take-back schemes for fishing gears, comparable to that of beverage containers. A third study by Szostek and colleagues (2022) presents a quantitative method to determine how effective different fishing management scenarios (e.g., gear modification or substitution, fishing effort.…”
Section: Fishing and Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%