2018
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2018.1429821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When attaining the best sample is out of reach: Nonprobability alternatives when engaging in public administration research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were recruited using non-probabilistic convenience sampling and were known to the research team through school-university links. While acknowledging the risks of selection and volunteer bias, this approach was appropriate for the first stage of a time-sensitive exploratory enquiry with a small sample and no available secondary data sources (Rivera, 2019).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were recruited using non-probabilistic convenience sampling and were known to the research team through school-university links. While acknowledging the risks of selection and volunteer bias, this approach was appropriate for the first stage of a time-sensitive exploratory enquiry with a small sample and no available secondary data sources (Rivera, 2019).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective participants were identified through school-university partnership activity and recruited using nonprobabilistic convenience sampling. While acknowledging the risks of selection and volunteer bias, this approach was appropriate for the first stage of a time sensitive exploratory enquiry with no available secondary data sources (Rivera, 2019). In addition, voluntariness is an important consideration in qualitative research on sensitive topics in pressured times (Graham et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elected officials and civil servant department heads in Grand Island, New York were chosen for inclusion in this study because in small-town settings these individuals tend to have the most interaction with citizens while developing local policies. As such, a purposive sample was composed of these individuals because it was believed that they would have the most insight into why and how NPS principles were being expressed in governance (Etikan et al 2016;Rivera 2018). Moreover, because the intention of this study was to observe how theory was being practiced as opposed to attempting to develop causal explanations, the purposive sample is sufficient for meeting that goal (Battaglia 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%