When opinion masquerades as fact

Demanding clarification that venous thrombosis is representative of vascular trauma

“…We agree absolutely with Donaruma et al that "Another point demanding clarification is interpreting venous thrombosis as representative of vascular trauma." 1 This clarification was the point of our article. 2 Our article is based on data acquired by review of the literature concerning the validity of the hypothesis that thrombosis of bridging veins (BV) is a marker of rupture and abuse; an opinion would not require such a factual basis.…”

“…We agree absolutely with Donaruma et al that “Another point demanding clarification is interpreting venous thrombosis as representative of vascular trauma.” 1 This clarification was the point of our article 2 …”