2016
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.7.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When the going gets rough – studying the effect of surface roughness on the adhesive abilities of tree frogs

Abstract: Tree frogs need to adhere to surfaces of various roughnesses in their natural habitats; these include bark, leaves and rocks. Rough surfaces can alter the effectiveness of their toe pads, due to factors such as a change of real contact area and abrasion of the pad epithelium. Here, we tested the effect of surface roughness on the attachment abilities of the tree frog Litoria caerulea. This was done by testing shear and adhesive forces on artificial surfaces with controlled roughness, both on single toe pads an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only for H. cinerea, tenacities are significantly higher on the 0.1 µm and the 15 µm substrate compared to the smooth one. These results are only partially in line with the findings of Crawford et al [34], who described for single pads of L. caerulea significantly higher tenacities for R = 0.3-16 µm, if compared to a smooth substrate. Presumably, this disagreement between rotation platform experiments and single pad studies arises from differences in pad loading.…”
Section: Friction Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only for H. cinerea, tenacities are significantly higher on the 0.1 µm and the 15 µm substrate compared to the smooth one. These results are only partially in line with the findings of Crawford et al [34], who described for single pads of L. caerulea significantly higher tenacities for R = 0.3-16 µm, if compared to a smooth substrate. Presumably, this disagreement between rotation platform experiments and single pad studies arises from differences in pad loading.…”
Section: Friction Performancesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…≈ 300 nm for the nanopillars [21] and ≈ 10 µm for the epidermal cells [20]). The attachment forces generated by the other proposed attachment mechanisms might also be critically attenuated with increasing substrate roughness, for example by reducing the effective contact area [49] or by meniscus cavitation [34,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is well above the maximum load of 1.27 N measured for single digital pads of Trachycephalus resinifictrix (Bijma et al 2016). Considering peak shear stresses of up to 70 kPa (Rhacophorus dennysi; Endlein et al 2017) and 140 kPa (Litoria caerulea; Crawford et al 2016) withstood by the epidermal surface, and the high tensile strength of the collagen layer, we argue that the digital pads are adapted primarily towards the generation and transmission of frictional rather than adhesive forces. This agrees with the functional demands on the pad arising from the locomotion and habitat of tree frogs.…”
Section: Transmission Of Shear Loadsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…) and 140 kPa ( Litoria caerulea ; Crawford et al. ) withstood by the epidermal surface, and the high tensile strength of the collagen layer, we argue that the digital pads are adapted primarily towards the generation and transmission of frictional rather than adhesive forces. This agrees with the functional demands on the pad arising from the locomotion and habitat of tree frogs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17] Natural adhesives have been the subject of several hundred years of research, [18,19] and the adhesion techniques of mussels, barnacles, and tree frogs have garnered considerable attention, inspiring an array of synthetic mimics. [20][21][22] Adhesives utilized by insects, however, have gone largely understudied when considering their diversity and abundance. [23] These insect adhesive systems exist as two overlapping categories: physical adhesive structures that mechanically interlock or generate attractive force through van der Waals' interactions, and chemical adhesive secretions that act via molecular bonding, capillary forces, and viscous forces.…”
Section: Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%