2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where AES is for Internet, SIMON could be for IoT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the presented implementation in [21] shows that AES rapidly decreases the lifetime of battery nodes and networks such as in ZigBee [22], and WirlessHART [23]. As such, it is safe to conclude that AES is not really suitable for constrained devices, such as IoT ones, as stated in [9,19,24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the presented implementation in [21] shows that AES rapidly decreases the lifetime of battery nodes and networks such as in ZigBee [22], and WirlessHART [23]. As such, it is safe to conclude that AES is not really suitable for constrained devices, such as IoT ones, as stated in [9,19,24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to the lightweight cipher implementations in [49], [53]- [55], where powers in the range of 37 to 278 µW/MHz are obtained using a 130 nm node and ranging from 3.1k to 18k gate equivalent (GE), we obtained a range of 62 to 733 µW/MHz with the 0.5 µm node. However, by implementing our system on a 130 nm node, considering the quadratic effect of decreasing voltage and capacitance [56], we estimate to reduce the system up to 10% of the current consumption, i.e., a range of 6.2 to 73 µW/MHz.…”
Section: Implementation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AES is widely optimized for hardware, and SIMON performs better than AES in software implementation. SIMON supports larger block sizes for data encryption than AES and can be used for resource-constrained IoT devices [ 77 ]. However, it is less tested and supported in industry and may not receive the same level of support and integration compared to AES.…”
Section: Proposed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%