2023
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where do we stand exactly with on‐scalp magnetoencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of refractory focal epilepsy?

Odile Feys,
Vincent Wens,
Pierre Corvilain
et al.

Abstract: O.F. is supported by the Fonds pour la formation à la recherche dans l'industrie et l'agriculture (FRIA, Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS), Brussels, Belgium). P.C. is supported by the Fonds Erasme (Convention "Alzheimer", Brussels, Belgium). X.D.T. is a clinical researcher at the FRS-FNRS. The cryogenic MEG and OPM-MEG projects at the Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles are financially supported by the Fonds Erasme (Brussels, Belgium; Research convention "Les Voies du Savoir" and "Projet de Recherc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the radial magnetic component remains a priori the optimal choice to record the signal of interest as it is larger in amplitude and less affected by volume conduction than tangential components ( Iivanainen et al, 2017 ). Thanks to their reduced size, Rb-OPMs can be placed directly on or very close to the scalp while recording physiological brain activity ( Boto et al, 2019 ; Borna et al, 2020 ; Boto et al, 2021 ) as well as epileptiform discharges in children ( Feys et al, 2022 , 2023a , b , d ) and adults ( Vivekananda et al, 2020 ; Hillebrand et al, 2023 ). In the case of pediatric epilepsy, the reduced brain-sensor distance afforded by on-scalp Rb-OPM-MEG led to higher IED amplitude and SNR compared with cryogenic MEG ( Feys et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the radial magnetic component remains a priori the optimal choice to record the signal of interest as it is larger in amplitude and less affected by volume conduction than tangential components ( Iivanainen et al, 2017 ). Thanks to their reduced size, Rb-OPMs can be placed directly on or very close to the scalp while recording physiological brain activity ( Boto et al, 2019 ; Borna et al, 2020 ; Boto et al, 2021 ) as well as epileptiform discharges in children ( Feys et al, 2022 , 2023a , b , d ) and adults ( Vivekananda et al, 2020 ; Hillebrand et al, 2023 ). In the case of pediatric epilepsy, the reduced brain-sensor distance afforded by on-scalp Rb-OPM-MEG led to higher IED amplitude and SNR compared with cryogenic MEG ( Feys et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%