2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where have the enteric viruses gone? - Differential effects on frequent causes of infectious diarrhoea by SARS-CoV-2 pandemic lockdown measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the prevalence of enteric AdV resurged quickly after NPIs had been relaxed in the post‐COVID‐19 period, with high detection rates in the second half of 2021. However, a study conducted in Germany reported that the positivity rates of enteric AdV decreased, and no resurgence was observed during the COVID‐19 pandemic (up to March 2021) 39 . The main reason for this discrepancy is probably the lack of full‐year data for 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the prevalence of enteric AdV resurged quickly after NPIs had been relaxed in the post‐COVID‐19 period, with high detection rates in the second half of 2021. However, a study conducted in Germany reported that the positivity rates of enteric AdV decreased, and no resurgence was observed during the COVID‐19 pandemic (up to March 2021) 39 . The main reason for this discrepancy is probably the lack of full‐year data for 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study conducted in Germany reported that the positivity rates of enteric AdV decreased, and no resurgence was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic (up to March 2021). 39 The main reason for this discrepancy is probably the lack of full-year data for 2021. A possible explanation for the quick resurgence is that AdV is a nonenveloped virus, which is generally considered more resistant to disinfectants, including alcohol.…”
Section: Understanding How the Transmission Dynamics Of Non-sars-covmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies found a similar percentage of positive CDI tests. 19 , 21 , 23 The percentage of hospitals applying ESCMID-recommended CDI testing algorithms in the Netherlands increased from 46% in 2015 to 57% in 2020. The use of NAAT only (38%) or toxin EIA only (0%) in 2020 compared to the mean of 2015-2019 (42% and 5%) were both slightly lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 14670 patients, 6458 (44%) were female and 8212 (56%) were male. Patients were divided into age groups such as (0-2), (3-7), (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) and (15)(16)(17)(18). The age group of 0-2 (n=8468) comprised the majority of patients with the rate of 57.7%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] In addition, these hygienic measures used to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 have also affected the incidence of viral pathogens that cause gastroenteritis. [12] In our study, the changing antigen positivity pattern of rotavirus and enteric adenovirus before and during the pandemic was analyzed. Also, the distribution of the frequencies of these viral agents according to age groups, gender and season of admittance was evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%