Where Should We Have the Meeting?

Maasakkers, Mattijs van; Oh, Jeeson

doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1685904

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Generally, the physical environment gets relatively little explicit attention in the literature. Van Maasakkers and Oh (2020: 196) conclude that only few scholars have engaged with “perhaps the most elemental consideration in designing participatory processes: how to create physical environments for productive interaction and conversations”. According to the authors, the venue is critical and should be carefully considered, as depending on its design, planners can exert significant influence over the process.…”

Section: Dimensions Of Public Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation

Hofer

Kaufmann

2022

Planning Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper systematises knowledge of public participation by bringing together existing concepts and theories from planning literature to conceptualise the 3A 3 -framework of participation. The framework presents participation as an emergent phenomenon, shaped by the dimensions: actors, arenas and aims. Each of these dimensions consists of three interacting elements. The framework highlights interdependencies between these elements and reflects them in the light of their embeddedness in planning processes and the wider social, cultural, political, spatial and temporal context. The framework can be used to gain a better understanding of what constitutes the phenomenon of participation. It enables the reflection of different forms of participation and contributes to more nuanced, and context-sensitive conceptions of and approaches to public participation in planning.

show abstract

Section: Dimensions Of Public Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation

Hofer

Kaufmann

2022

Planning Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A signaling game approach of siting conflict mediation for the construction of waste incineration facilities under information asymmetry

Jin

Wang

Qian

et al. 2022

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Demise of “Advocacy Planning” in Community Design? A Content Analysis of the Mission Statements of Community Design Centers (CDCs) in the United States

Lee

2023

Journal of Planning Education and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigates the role(s) of contemporary community design centers (CDC) in the United States. Based on a content analysis of CDCs’ mission statements and semi-structured interviews with selected CDC leaders, I identify seven roles these organizations perform. The results indicate that current CDCs do not exclusively focus on assisting underserved communities. They perform a more diverse set of roles for various socioeconomic communities. These different roles suggest that CDCs can, and should, be thought of as a diverse category of planning organization. In conclusion, I suggest three implications for planning education and future research and practice related to community design.

show abstract

Where Should We Have the Meeting?

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation

Actors, arenas and aims: A conceptual framework for public participation

A signaling game approach of siting conflict mediation for the construction of waste incineration facilities under information asymmetry

The Demise of “Advocacy Planning” in Community Design? A Content Analysis of the Mission Statements of Community Design Centers (CDCs) in the United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About