2017
DOI: 10.5130/ajceb.v17i1.5270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Where the Gaps Lie: Ten Years of Research into Collaboration on BIM-Enabled Construction Projects

Abstract: A BIM-enabled Construction Project (BIMCP) refers to a project involving relevant BIM tools to generate, exchange and manage project data between project participants. Success in delivering BIMCPs largely relies on how effective project members collaborate. As a result, collaboration on BIMCP has become a growing field of research while a review of studies on collaboration on BIMCPs is still missing. To address this gap, this paper presents the findings of a systematic review on studies devoted to collaboratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, drawing upon the framework proposed by Poirier et al (2016) and the CCWM model proposed by Patel et al (2012), the collaboration antecedents in BbCNs have been synthesized into a so-called Collaboration Pentagon as illustrated in Effective collaboration in BIM-enabled construction projects requires focusing beyond the technology-oriented debate in collaboration (Oraee et al, 2017). In essence, collaborative working requires the integration of all collaboration antecedents (Patel et al, 2012, Bedwell et al, 2012.…”
Section: Collaboration Pentagonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, drawing upon the framework proposed by Poirier et al (2016) and the CCWM model proposed by Patel et al (2012), the collaboration antecedents in BbCNs have been synthesized into a so-called Collaboration Pentagon as illustrated in Effective collaboration in BIM-enabled construction projects requires focusing beyond the technology-oriented debate in collaboration (Oraee et al, 2017). In essence, collaborative working requires the integration of all collaboration antecedents (Patel et al, 2012, Bedwell et al, 2012.…”
Section: Collaboration Pentagonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation of the dominance of 'process' barriers (shorthand for technical barriers) is in line with previous studies' arguments on collaboration in BbCNs, asserting that technology "push" has remained the prevalent theme of the available studies (cf. Mignone et al, 2016;Oraee et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Barriers As Reflected In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature shows that many scholars have tried developing innovative technologies to facilitate collaboration (Sacks et al , 2018; Elghaish et al , 2019). However, research on collaboration in BbCNs is dominated by the technology discourse (Oraee et al , 2017a), focussing on the software-central view of BIM (Papadonikolaki et al , 2019) and overlooking the crucial role of people management (Liu et al , 2017), despite the observation that people management is the major source of ineffective collaboration in BbCNs (Liao and Teo, 2018; Merschbrock et al , 2018). Scholars such as Mignone et al (2016), Merschbrock et al (2018) and Li et al (2019) emphasise the role of people, exploring collaboration issues in particular projects and discussing the solutions adopted, but their findings lack the ability to be generalized beyond the immediate settings of their studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure of industry practitioners in shifting common practices to foster collaboration among members in BbCNs remains and omnipresent and vexing problem (Poirier et al , 2016; Oraee et al , 2017a; Alreshidi et al , 2018). Identifying the barriers that act as the root causes behind this problem is a predicate to provide remedial solutions (Merschbrock et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%