2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03554-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial

Abstract: Background Offspring of women with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of fetal growth patterns which are associated with perinatal morbidity. Our aim was to compare rates of large- and small-for-gestational age (LGA; SGA) defined according to different criteria, using data from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT). Methods This was a pre-specified analysis of CONCEPTT involving 225 pregnant women and li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gestational age was based upon last menstrual period (or early pregnancy ultrasound when discordant). Grow centiles were calculated using version 8 of the GROW calculator 15,16 . Fisher's and Cochran's Q tests were used to address differences in UCPCR positivity between study periods.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gestational age was based upon last menstrual period (or early pregnancy ultrasound when discordant). Grow centiles were calculated using version 8 of the GROW calculator 15,16 . Fisher's and Cochran's Q tests were used to address differences in UCPCR positivity between study periods.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONCEPTT collaborative group published the main article in 2017 ( 5 ); however, there continues to be a plethora of subanalyses ( 10 25 ) to glean more insight into the optimal care of this special population that is underrepresented in research. Our objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the findings of the CONCEPTT collaborative group’s primary analysis ( 5 ) and subanalyses ( 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ) so as to provide a summary of all of the group’s published findings presented in one publication. We searched PubMed for articles published with restrictions to English language with the search terms ‘type 1 diabetes’ and ‘pregnancy’ and ‘continuous glucose monitor’ and ‘women’ and ‘CONCEPTT’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We searched PubMed for articles published with restrictions to English language with the search terms ‘type 1 diabetes’ and ‘pregnancy’ and ‘continuous glucose monitor’ and ‘women’ and ‘CONCEPTT’. We identified 17 articles including a protocol summary ( 10 ), the main article ( 5 ) and 15 subanalyses ( 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ). The subanalyses reviewed seven general concepts: (i) are insulin pumps better than MDI in neonatal and maternal outcomes?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of small-forgestational-age (SGA) neonates born to women with type 1 diabetes remained stable at around 3-4% up to 2010 in Denmark [9,10], with a small increase to 6-7% in the last 10 years [11]. In a recent large multicentre trial, rates of LGA offspring were 62-65% and of SGA offspring were 1-2%, depending which growth chart was used [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%