WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Permanent Hearing Loss and Tinnitus

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss is defined as worsening of hearing acuity and is usually expressed as an increase in the hearing threshold. Tinnitus, defined as “ringing in the ear”, is a common and often disturbing accompaniment of hearing loss. Hearing loss and environmental exposures to noise are increasingly recognized health problems. Objectives: The objective was to assess whether the exposure-response relationship can be established between exposures to non-occupational noise and permanent hearing outcomes such as permanent hearing loss and tinnitus. Methods: Information sources: Computer searches of all accessible medical and other databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were performed and complemented with manual searches. The search was not limited to a particular time span, except for the effects of personal listening devices (PLDs). The latter was limited to the years 2008–June 2015, since previous knowledge was summarized by SCENIHR descriptive systematic review published in 2008. Study eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria were as follows: the exposure to noise was measured in sound pressure levels (SPLs) and expressed in individual equivalent decibel values (LEX,8h), the studies included both exposed and reference groups, the outcome was a permanent health effect, i.e., permanent hearing loss assessed with pure-tone audiometry and/or permanent tinnitus assessed with a questionnaire. The eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: The risk of bias was assessed for all of the papers using a template for assessment of quality and the risk of bias. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation) approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence. Meta-analysis was not possible due to methodological heterogeneity of included studies and the inadequacy of data. Results: Out of 220 references identified, five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All of them were related to the use of PLDs and comprised in total of 1551 teenagers and young adults. Three studies used hearing loss as the outcome and three tinnitus. There was a positive correlation between noise level and hearing loss either at standard or extended high frequencies in all three of the studies on hearing loss. In one study, there was also a positive correlation between the duration of PLD use and hearing loss. There was no association between prolonged listening to loud music through PLDs and tinnitus or the results were contradictory. All of the evidence was of low quality. Limitations: The studies are cross-sectional. No study provides odds ratios of hearing loss by the level of exposure to noise. Conclusions: While using very strict inclusion criteria, there is low quality GRADE evidence that prolonged listening to loud music through PLDs increases the risk of hearing loss and results in worsening standard frequency audiometric thresholds. However, specific threshold analyses focused on stratifying risk according to clearly defined l...

Environmental and Health Effects of Ventilation in Subway Stations: A Literature Review

“…Noise generated by ventilation systems constitutes a limited part of subway noise but lasts the longest. Long-term exposure to environmental noise can have a number of health effects [309,310]. The primary sources of subway noise include subway operation, public broadcasting, and human activities.…”

NoiseModelling: An Open Source GIS Based Tool to Produce Environmental Noise Maps

“…One of the major original features of the present approach rests upon the construction of the point sources for each calculation point and not for all the receivers points, as depicted at figure 5. This allows to reduce the amount of point sources required at each calculation point, in respect of equations (2). Besides, for the same purpose of limiting the amount of calculations, only sound sources located within a critical radius centred on each calculation point are considered.…”

“…Considering noise exposure, many works have shown that it can be associated to many adverse health outcomes, such as hearing impairments and tinnitus [2], cardiovascular and metabolic repercussions [3], learning impairment [4], sleep disorders [5], annoyance [6]. .…”

Review of Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks for Environmental Noise Monitoring in Smart Cities

“…Several studies of the World Health Organization (WHO) [9] conclude that the diseases related to the effect of noise on people are producing a huge loss in healthy life years, in addition to the annoyance it causes to neighbors [10]. For instance, permanent hearing loss and tinnitus are associated with noise exposure [8,11].Moreover, it has been argued that noise can lead to adverse birth outcomes, as stated in [12], a work focused on studying the effects of aircra noise on preterm births. More specifically, RTNone of the main noise sources in urban areas-increases tiredness and disturbs the sleep pattern [13].…”