2012
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Who is stressed? Comparing cortisol levels between individuals

Abstract: The use of single raw cortisol values is inadequate to compare physiological stress levels across individuals. If the distributions of individuals' cortisol values are approximately normal, then the standardized ranking method is most appropriate; otherwise, the sample percentile method is advised. These methods may be applied to compare stress levels across individuals in other populations and species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10–15 specimens per individual) would be needed to get a true baseline for a sample size of 5–30 cycling female participants [65]. Less is known about the variance of male cortisol values.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10–15 specimens per individual) would be needed to get a true baseline for a sample size of 5–30 cycling female participants [65]. Less is known about the variance of male cortisol values.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work should examine cortisol levels on the same day in which women are asked to keep a diary and/or wear an ambulatory hot flash monitor (Rubin et al 2014). Another limitation is that the timing of the true peak in CAR for each individual is not known, and this could affect the levels of cortisol measured (Nepomnaschy et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants provided, on average, 19 ± 1.90 FMU samples each (average ± sample SD; range: 13–22). This sampling collection protocol permitted us to determine an average level of FMU cortisol for each individual and monitor day-to-day variation in urinary free cortisol levels within- and among-individuals [35]. Upon waking, participants collected their first urinary voids into sterile, inert plastic containers provided by our research team the night before the collection day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously argued that the use of first morning urinary cortisol allows for a tighter control of these confounders than cortisol quantification in other matrices such as saliva and blood [34]. Additionally, basal HPAA activity and responsivity varies markedly within and between individuals [35,36]. Thus, the single cortisol measurement frequently used in cross-sectional studies is not adequate to accurately assess HPAA activity [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation