2017 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/prni.2017.7981496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Whole brain functional connectivity predicted by indirect structural connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that functional connectivity in the brain may be driven by cortico-cortical WM connections and that functional patterns can be retained in the presence of indirect structural connections (O’Reilly et al, 2013). More recently, the incorporation of indirect structural pathways have also been shown to be more robust predictors of functional connectivity (Røge et al, 2017). Another possible reason for the discrepancy shown between functional and structural connectivity is simply that the analysis methods used in this study may not be sensitive enough to tease out all functional-structural relationships between GM and WM (further discussed in Section 4.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that functional connectivity in the brain may be driven by cortico-cortical WM connections and that functional patterns can be retained in the presence of indirect structural connections (O’Reilly et al, 2013). More recently, the incorporation of indirect structural pathways have also been shown to be more robust predictors of functional connectivity (Røge et al, 2017). Another possible reason for the discrepancy shown between functional and structural connectivity is simply that the analysis methods used in this study may not be sensitive enough to tease out all functional-structural relationships between GM and WM (further discussed in Section 4.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fully characterize the functional relationship between A and C , however, we may wish to consider other nodes’ time series that can make indirect functional connections, or alternate paths, between them. Previous research has shown that, although direct structural connections alone do not predict functional connectivity well, incorporating indirect structural paths can improve predictions of functional connectivity (Deligianni et al, ; Røge et al, ). It is possible that, analogously, predictions of behavior can be improved by taking into account nodes on indirect functional paths along with direct functional paths.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honey and colleagues 36 reasoned that this unambiguity might be explained by indirect connections, mediated by a third brain region. As well, Roge and colleagues 37 and Deligianni and colleagues 38 demonstrated that functional connections can be predicted by indirect struc-tural connections up to the second order (i.e., indirect pathways with 2 internodes). In line with these findings, we investigated structural pathways between the left dlPFC and the cingulate cortex with up to 2 internodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Validation of this measure in replication studies is therefore highly recommended. In accordance with Roge and colleagues 37 and Deligianni and colleagues, 38 we studied pathways up to 2 internodes. Given that more internodes results in more potential pathways, the direction of neuronal communication (orthodromic versus antidromic) cannot be derived from dMRI data.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%