2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2962625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Adopt a Federal Constitution? And Why Decentralize? Determinants Based on a New Dataset

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the 1999 Constitution permits a presidential system of government. Federalism was adopted due to the geographical size and population of the country (Gutmann & Voigt, 2017), as well as to address all manners of inequality (Demarest et al, 2020). These variables could be measured through how the 3CD helps to achieve service delivery.…”
Section: Decentralization To the Lgs In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the 1999 Constitution permits a presidential system of government. Federalism was adopted due to the geographical size and population of the country (Gutmann & Voigt, 2017), as well as to address all manners of inequality (Demarest et al, 2020). These variables could be measured through how the 3CD helps to achieve service delivery.…”
Section: Decentralization To the Lgs In Nigeriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinction between "bottom up" versus "top down" federalism might be an option to take this hypothesis to the test. Gutmann and Voigt (2017) inquire into the determinants of both federalism and decentralization. They find that higher levels of linguistic fractionalization are significantly correlated with what they call top down federalism.…”
Section: Separation Of Powersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguments of the kind essentially go further than many academic contributions that highlight the fiscal benefits of separation, where secession could be seen as a possibility to limit unjust taxation and achieve a more equitable tax treatment by a government closer to the regional electorat (Buchanan & Faith, 1987;Gutmann & Voigt, 2017;Rode et al, 2018;Vaubel, 2013). 3 Instead, they rely on a literature that interprets social capital as a path-dependent factor of economic success.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%