2016
DOI: 10.7322/jhgd.113712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do women in the private sector have shorter pregnancies in Brazil? Left shift of gestational age, caesarean section and inversion of the expected disparity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
15

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, elective cesarean section without labor is a common procedure, sometimes justified by a maternal choice and protective factor for the development of PFD. 44 , 45 In some cases, cesarean section is indicated due to obstetric intercurrences such as pregnancy-specific hypertensive disease, failure to progress, or cephalopelvic disproportion, among others. 44 , 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, elective cesarean section without labor is a common procedure, sometimes justified by a maternal choice and protective factor for the development of PFD. 44 , 45 In some cases, cesarean section is indicated due to obstetric intercurrences such as pregnancy-specific hypertensive disease, failure to progress, or cephalopelvic disproportion, among others. 44 , 46 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O tempo de gestação entre os RNs na rede não SUS foi menor, independentemente do tipo de parto. Entre os nascidos por cesárea, o desvio à esquerda foi mais acentuado e o pico de cirurgias aconteceu em 38 semanas, resultado semelhante ao encontrado por Diniz e colaboradores (2016) 7 . Não há informações suficientes no SINASC para identificar gestações de risco, porém a elevada proporção de cesáreas nestes serviços (70%) sugere que muitas foram eletivas, em desacordo ao ACOG, que recomenda que os partos eletivos sejam realizados com pelo menos 39 semanas de gestação 8 .…”
Section: The Impact Of the Type Of Hospital And Delivery On The Gestaunclassified
“…However, when the proportion of cesarean sections in a population exceeds the level between 10% and 15%, these intervention disadvantages tend to outweigh the potential benefits for mothers and infants, especially when performed before the spontaneous onset of labor and the 39 full weeks of gestation 4 , 5 . This is the case in Brazil, where GA in childbirth has decreased, as a result of the overestimation of the safety of interventions associated with the abbreviation of pregnancy (cesarean section and induction of labor) 6 , 7 .…”
Section: The Excess Of Childbirth Interventions Has Reduced the Duratmentioning
confidence: 99%