Win-win outcomes in waste separation behavior in the rural area: A case study in vietnam

Autonomous Motivation for the Successful Implementation of Waste Management Policy: An Examination Using an Adapted Institutional Analysis and Development Framework in Thua Thien Hue, Vietnam

“…For a long time, food waste has been commonly used to feed animals [63], and the same holds true in Vietnam, where households who raise livestock (i.e., pigs or chickens or both) conduct waste separation as a means of securing sustenance for their animals [21,22]. This means that communities' livestock negatively affects their engagement in waste separation for composting as residents have long used food waste to feed their animals.…”

“…Sources of information regarding the CCP. Quantitative raw data were obtained from Nguyen et al [21], who also carried out a study in Huong Xuan and Quang Tho. These data were used to conduct an analysis of community attributes, which are part of the IAD framework.…”

“…Thus, these interviewees were all over 50 years old and they had lived in their villages for a long time (i.e., more than 20 years) and had good relationships with other residents. Their opinions were, therefore, considered representative of their entire villages, which have special rural characteristics, such as a sense of community (i.e., close, open-hearted, and trusting relationships between people) [21]. In Huong Xuan, the waste collector, accompanied by the village leader, went to each household to collect organic waste around 5 a.m. every Tuesday, Thursday, and Sunday.…”

“…Socioeconomic factors, such as gender [17], education [18], and income [19], likewise bear on waste separation behavior. Socio-psychological factors impact this behavior, especially attitude [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], satisfaction with local facilities [27], beliefs and social norms [28,29], and trust between people and authorities [22].In the practical projects, in high-income countries the principle factors were learned from success stories such as voluntary participation systems, communication by local newspapers, and door-to-door campaigns deployed in apartment buildings. These factors defined the success of the implementation of food waste separation in Daejeon Metropolitan City in Korea, Umea in Sweden, and the Oxford City Council in the UK, where achievements are attributed principally to the focus directed toward community participation [30].…”

“…Socioeconomic factors, such as gender [17], education [18], and income [19], likewise bear on waste separation behavior. Socio-psychological factors impact this behavior, especially attitude [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], satisfaction with local facilities [27], beliefs and social norms [28,29], and trust between people and authorities [22].…”