“…These large Q 10f values increased the effective turnover time in permafrost to 10 000 years or more and allowed the proper buildup of permafrost carbon. However, they also had the undesired effect of effectively shutting down wintertime respiration, which can account for a significant fraction of total annual respiration (Alm et al, 1999;Fang et al, 1999;Zimov et al, 1993aZimov et al, , b, 1996Schmidt and Lipson, 2004). The problem is that the Q 10f formulation based on the Arrhenius equation does not account for substrate availability, making it inappropriate when representing permafrost carbon dynamics on timescales of 500 to 10 000 years.…”