2007
DOI: 10.1080/09064710600931230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter triticale grain yield, a comparative study of 15 genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study are in conformity with the findings of Kozak et al (2007) too, who reported that two major yield components are number of ears and number of grains per ear per unit area, and more effort should be put into a good stand shaped by means of agronomic treatments, particularly at tillering and stem elongation growth stages when formation of these yield components takes place.…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of the present study are in conformity with the findings of Kozak et al (2007) too, who reported that two major yield components are number of ears and number of grains per ear per unit area, and more effort should be put into a good stand shaped by means of agronomic treatments, particularly at tillering and stem elongation growth stages when formation of these yield components takes place.…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The relation between yield and yield components indicated that ears m -2 and grains ear -1 produced the greatest influence on grain yield. Kozak et al (2007) found that grain yield is usually positively correlated with all its components; the spikes m -2 is not correlated with grain spike -1 ; spikes m -2 is not or is negatively correlated with grain weight; and there is no significant correlation between the grain spike -1 and grain weight, or the correlation is positive. Garcia del Moral et al (2003) also found the relationship between grain and its components and path coefficients analysis helped to establish the causality of the relation.…”
Section: Tgw -Thousand Grain Weightmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Path analysis is a basic method that enables inferences to be drawn about causal structure of data. Path coefficient is a numerical estimate of the causal relationship between two variables in the path analysis (Kozak, Kang, 2006). The yield components have either a direct or indirect effect on grain yield, or both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the latter cultivar were quite similar though the contribution of mean number of kernels per spike was two times greater than that of kernel weight, number of spikes per m 2 being unimportant. Nevertheless, in other results on the same cultivars, Kozak et al (2007b) obtained fairly different results, in which it was number of spikes per m 2 that was the main component in determining grain yield of cultivar Bogo, contributing to about 50% of yield determination. For cultivar Fidelio this difference was not so visible, but still the first component accounted for 26% of grain yield determination, while in Samborski et al (2005) study this contribution was 0%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…One example for this is the above-mentioned research by Kozak et al (2007b), who studied 15 winter triticale genotypes in terms of yield component analysis. From that study it clearly follows that there is a strong influence of genotype on YCA, which means that the results of YCA may greatly vary among genotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%