2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2008.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women as collateral damage: A critique of egg harvesting for cloning research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Waldby (2015b, 2019) has laid the cornerstone for this line of research in her qualitative studies of the clinical actors, egg vendors, and recipients bound up in egg “donation.” In her insightful analysis of egg markets, Waldby (2019) traces the historical trajectory of the perceived value of human eggs, how they become open to management and exchange, and the power dynamics embedded within the global human egg market. Human egg exchange has long been stratified by age and class, with younger poor women generally acting as producers and older affluent women as recipients, which raises serious ethical concerns regarding these markets (Daniels and Heidt‐Forsythe, 2012; George, 2008; Heidt‐Forsythe, 2018; Waldby, 2019; Waldby and Cooper, 2010).…”
Section: Markets and Commoditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waldby (2015b, 2019) has laid the cornerstone for this line of research in her qualitative studies of the clinical actors, egg vendors, and recipients bound up in egg “donation.” In her insightful analysis of egg markets, Waldby (2019) traces the historical trajectory of the perceived value of human eggs, how they become open to management and exchange, and the power dynamics embedded within the global human egg market. Human egg exchange has long been stratified by age and class, with younger poor women generally acting as producers and older affluent women as recipients, which raises serious ethical concerns regarding these markets (Daniels and Heidt‐Forsythe, 2012; George, 2008; Heidt‐Forsythe, 2018; Waldby, 2019; Waldby and Cooper, 2010).…”
Section: Markets and Commoditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ama bugün bu sorular gündelik hayatımızın bir parçası olma yolunda. 2 Bu gibi teknolojiler insanlara yeni olanaklar sunmakta, ancak, bu olanaklar söz konusu teknolojilerin uygulayıcısı olan tıp kurumunun süregelen hiyerarşileri içinde yeni bir tahakküm alanına da dönüşmekte. Sömürgeciliğin antropolojiyle ilişkisi, 3 bilimkurgu yazarlarının insan eliyle üretilmiş androidlere ya da bu üretimde kobay olan kadınlara yönelik endişelerin tarihsel bir dışavurumu.…”
unclassified