Women’s Studies and Contingency: Between Exploitation and Resistance

Abstract

But in what ways does women's studies' relatively precarious place within academia fit into these conversations? How do feminists working in a variety of disciplines reconcile their feminist labor politics with the need to grow their programs and departments under the edicts of the corporate university, particularly when relying upon contingent labor to do so? These questions were at the heart of three collectively organized sessions on feminist contingency at the 2014 annual National Women's Studies Association Conference (NWSA) in San Juan, Puerto Rico, the highlights of which are presented here. This article hopes that the lessons learned in this historic event-lessons about silence-breaking and collectivizing, but also about inequity, privilege, shame, and guilt-will be used in women's studies classrooms, departmental meetings, and beyond, contributing to the growing conversation about this important issue, and perhaps even offering action steps toward solutions.

Community geography for precarious researchers: examining the intricacies of mutually beneficial and co-produced knowledge

“…The pressures faced by precarious researchers, particularly graduate students, have real and sometimes long-term consequences (Smith 2016 ). In its efforts to restructure research and teaching institutions, community geography must consider those who occupy precarious positions and examine how it can resist the exploitation of anxiety (Hall and Bowles 2016 ) re-imagine timelines and funding (Arrigoitia et al 2016 ; Gupta 2018 ; Schwartz 2014 ).…”

Work–life balance for native and migrant scholars in German academia: meanings and practices

“…Work crises as a result of technological progress and erosion of standard employment relationships in academia not only urge top individual performance, but also entail a rethinking of work-life balance. Ongoing contemporary discussions mostly address the type of contract (with temporary considered disadvantageous) and focus on individual practices to overcome precariousness, pressure and uncertain career trajectories (Gill, 2010;Busso and Rivetti, 2014;Arrigoitia et al, 2015). The male standard employment relationship, i.e.…”