2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00125.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working in and around the ‘chain of command’: power relations among nursing staff in an urban nursing home

Abstract: By most accounts, the discipline of nursing enjoys considerable hegemony in US nursing homes. Not surprisingly, the ethos of this setting is influenced, in large part, by nursing's value system. This ethos powerfully impacts both the residents who live in nursing homes and the staff who work there. Using ethnographic methods, this project explored power relations among nursing assistants and nurses in an urban nursing home in the United States. Factors contributing to tensions among nursing staff were the stig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…as being important for an effective nurse supervisor in LTC included having a genuine admiration and affinity toward working with older adults (Cooper & Mitchell, 2006;Jervis, 2002;Moyle et al, 2003) as well as empathy, compassion, and sense of humor (Cooper & Mitchell, 2006;Dellefield, 2008). In the quantitative study, increased nurse age and personal attributes (e.g., financial, job-related physical and emotional health change) were associated with the effectiveness of a nurse supervisor.…”
Section: Structures Related To Supervisory Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…as being important for an effective nurse supervisor in LTC included having a genuine admiration and affinity toward working with older adults (Cooper & Mitchell, 2006;Jervis, 2002;Moyle et al, 2003) as well as empathy, compassion, and sense of humor (Cooper & Mitchell, 2006;Dellefield, 2008). In the quantitative study, increased nurse age and personal attributes (e.g., financial, job-related physical and emotional health change) were associated with the effectiveness of a nurse supervisor.…”
Section: Structures Related To Supervisory Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Others have noted that the nursing profession is itself rigid, authoritarian, punitive, strict, rule-bound, and highly selfprotective-traits that might not only be considered masculine, but that also block power sharing with other female-dominated groups such as nurse aides in nursing homes (perhaps because closer ties to the aides may compromise the nurse's status and professional identity, which is already threatened by working in the historically stigmatized setting). 5,[123][124][125] Jameson 126 complicates things further by contemplating that conflict principle of collusion explains how both doctors and nurses play expected, if grating, roles that are consistent with the mythos of historic doctornurse relationships: the domineering male versus the compliant female. Both expect, subconsciously, to be treated in certain ways: doctors expect deference, whereas nurses assume the mantle of a resentful and disrespected servant.…”
Section: Structural Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their job is still considered unskilled and menial by society, despite its significance in supporting the well-being of vulnerable individuals. CNAs have little to no status in the health care community, receive little respect, and have no autonomy on the job (Crickmer, 2005;Jervis, 2002). Their average earnings are less than $10 an hour with minimal benefits, and many of them have incomes that are below the poverty line in spite of their full-time and often overloaded work schedules (Potter, Churilla, & Smith, 2006).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are at the bottom of the health care hierarchy, in terms of status, salary, and privileges, while white middle-class women occupy higher-level managerial and supervisory positions (Dodson & Zincavage, 2007;Glenn, 1992;Jervis, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%