2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-2990-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace performance of a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator during nanoparticle synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the nanoparticle aerosol has been generated, both large scale industrial filters and smaller scale personal gas mask filters could be considered. In two recent studies (Koivisto et al, 2012;Koivisto et al, 2015), a potential inhalation dose and performance of a loose fitting respiratory filter were evaluated using particle size distribution and concentration data obtained from a LFS generated aerosol in a test room.…”
Section: Test Aerosol Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the nanoparticle aerosol has been generated, both large scale industrial filters and smaller scale personal gas mask filters could be considered. In two recent studies (Koivisto et al, 2012;Koivisto et al, 2015), a potential inhalation dose and performance of a loose fitting respiratory filter were evaluated using particle size distribution and concentration data obtained from a LFS generated aerosol in a test room.…”
Section: Test Aerosol Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extracted papers, filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) or elastomeric half masks with particulate filters (EHR) were studied, and there was one paper on a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator in the field use handling of MNMs [34]. The classes of the particulate respirators of the FFRs and EHRs in the papers were N95, N99, N100 and P100 certified by US NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, USA) (84 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 11 [48]), or P2, P3, FFP2 and FFP3 according to the European standard EN143 [49] and EN149 [50].…”
Section: Performance Of Respirators For Nanoparticle Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloth masks are useless in protecting workers handling nanomaterials. There was one paper on a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator in which the PFs were measured in 3 human subjects [34], where the values of PFs were over 1.1 million, but those were not included in Fig. 4 because it was an outlier.…”
Section: Performance Of Respirators For Nanoparticle Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'source' compartment of the conceptual model consists of two principal modifying factors: substance emission potential (characteristics of the material) and activity emission potential (emission potential of a material during a particular usage). There are numerous peer reviewed papers describing the results of studies in occupational and experimental settings looking at the potential of release and concentration levels during handling of NOAA or NOAA-containing products (Methner, 2008;Jensen et al, 2009;Tsai, 2010;Rengasamy, 2011;Burdett et al, 2013;Rengasamy, 2013;Tsai, 2013;Bouillard et al, 2014;Rengasamy, 2015;Koivisto, 2015;Levin et al, 2015;Ding and Riediker, 2015). However, only a few studies have looked at the effect of determinants influencing the emission potential by using laboratory bench tests, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%