WRI CCS Guidelines and Emerging Geologic Sequestration Regulations: A Comparative Assessment

Forbes, Sarah; Verma, Preeti; Friedmann, S. Julio; Curry, Thomas E.; Wade, Sarah; Venezia, John

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.230

Cited by 11 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Water is known to be the side product for combustion (Anheden et al 2005;De Visser et al 2008;Det Norske Veritas 2010;Forbes et al 2008;SNC-Lavalin Inc 2004). This compound is harmless on its own, but it can cause problem to the system when it reacts with other impurities present in the stream.…”

Section: Water (H 2 O)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The water level should be kept as low as possible to avoid excessive and stress corrosion as well as hydration production (Neele et al 2017). For example, when H 2 O reacts with CO 2 itself, it will produce carbonic acid (H 2 CO 3 ), chemical equation is shown in (1), which is a type of dibasic acid which easily decomposed at certain temperature and pressure (Forbes et al 2008;Wang et al 2016).…”

Section: Water (H 2 O)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In term of utilization segment, likewise with carbon monoxide, the presence of these gasses also can boost the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) thus can affect the EOR performance (SNC-Lavalin Inc 2004). Other than that, the presence of oxygen may pose as fire hazard and also can increased bacteria growth in the field (Forbes et al 2008;Shirley and Myles 2019;White et al 2009).…”

Section: Nitrogen (N 2 ) Oxygen (O 2 ) and Argon (Ar)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other than that, one study found that the presence of H 2 S in the stream can cause pore blockage at the storage site, this is unfavourable as it may limit the efficiency of the storage (Wang 2015). Due to the dangerous consequences that these gasses may cause, the standards or common practice for the maximum allowable limit for H 2 S is very low when compared to other impurities at 50 µmol/mol (Forbes et al 2008).…”

Section: Sulphur Oxides (So X ) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H 2 S)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Physical and chemical effect of impurities in carbon capture, utilisation and storage

Razak

Saaid

Yusof

et al. 2023

J Petrol Explor Prod Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Deployment of carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) technologies to mitigate climate change and overturn CO2 emissions growth would require transformational changes comprehensively. The primary focus of this manuscript is on the impurities standards and limitation that can ensure project feasibility in the long run. There is a need in the industry for guidance on purity analysis prior to capture, shipment, and storage of carbon dioxide. This is because the cost to capture and separate the stream is proving to be very costly that can make the project to be unfeasible to operate. Following this further, this manuscript discusses the previous research and best practices that establish standards for acceptable impurities that might present in the stream and its effects towards the CCUS system. Consequently, this manuscript also provides better understanding on the impurities effects towards CCUS technology system in general. Understanding these limitations, may provide cost effective solution for CCUS problems that revolves around the impurities in CO2 stream. Impurities can affect some components of the carbon capture and storage process. It is clear that even a little number of impurities can cause the carbon dioxide stream properties to change. There are two primary factors discussed in this manuscript that affect how a CCUS system responds to a CO2 stream that contains impurities: a physical and chemical effects.

show abstract

Section: Water (H 2 O)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Water (H 2 O)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Nitrogen (N 2 ) Oxygen (O 2 ) and Argon (Ar)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sulphur Oxides (So X ) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H 2 S)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Physical and chemical effect of impurities in carbon capture, utilisation and storage

Razak

Saaid

Yusof

et al. 2023

J Petrol Explor Prod Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…With a focus on environmental and human health risk assessment and risk management (RA/RM), both regulators and non-government organisations have published elaborated frameworks and guidance documents aimed at ensuring safe and effective project development and operations. Previous analysis of RA/RM provisions was completed for the London and OSPAR Conventions, the then-draft European Union CCS Directive, then-draft USEPA Underground Injection Control Program rule and national and sub-national provisions in Canada and Australia (Condor et al, 2011a(Condor et al, , 2011bForbes et al, 2009;Stenhouse et al, 2009). Pollak and Wilson (2009) compared three regulatory approaches, including provisions for performance objectives and RA then being developed for the EPA and two states.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk assessment and management frameworks for carbon capture and geological storage: a global perspective

Larkin

Leiss

Krewski

2019

IJRAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is included in the list of technological processes that could reduce point source carbon dioxide emissions that contribute to climate change. For geological storage projects, global frameworks for environmental and human health risk assessment (RA) and risk management (RM) have been developed within various regional and national jurisdictions as well as by non-government organisations since the 2005 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on CCS. This article provides an updated compendium of elaborated RA/RM frameworks in leading jurisdictions for CCS in the regulatory and non-regulatory contexts including online resources. Using a 3-or 4-step RA, there is an emphasis on storage site selection and characterisation; an iterative approach is recommended for RM emphasising monitoring and re-assessment; and other risk-based considerations such as communications and transparency are discussed more frequently in non-government guidance. Comprehensive risk estimation is not yet promoted.

show abstract

Risk Assessment, Risk Management and Remediation for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Storage of Carbon Dioxide

Maul

2011

Advances in Global Change Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WRI CCS Guidelines and Emerging Geologic Sequestration Regulations: A Comparative Assessment

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Physical and chemical effect of impurities in carbon capture, utilisation and storage

Physical and chemical effect of impurities in carbon capture, utilisation and storage

Risk assessment and management frameworks for carbon capture and geological storage: a global perspective

Risk Assessment, Risk Management and Remediation for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste and Storage of Carbon Dioxide

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About