Writing a review article: Making sense of the jumble

Agarwal, Nitin; Dewan, Pooja

doi:10.1007/s13312-016-0915-z

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…60 Critical qualitative and quantitative appraisal. 71 Studies assessed for risk of bia.s 55 No formal quality assessment. 63 Does not require appraisal/risk-of-bias assessment for individual studies.…”

Section: Data Extraction or Charting Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The source selection process may be subjective and lack explicit criteria for inclusion and exclusion, which can lead to bias. 62,71 The appraisal of the literature is variable and may be qualitative. 55,61,71 Also, the assimilation, synthesis, and conclusion are subjective and may be influenced by the authors’ personal review of literature.…”

Section: Systematic Reviews Scoping Reviews Meta-analyses and Narrati...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…62,71 The appraisal of the literature is variable and may be qualitative. 55,61,71 Also, the assimilation, synthesis, and conclusion are subjective and may be influenced by the authors’ personal review of literature. Therefore, the results of the review may not be replicable 71 (Table 2).…”

Section: Systematic Reviews Scoping Reviews Meta-analyses and Narrati...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Kertai,

Makkad,

Bollen

et al. 2023

Anesthesia &Amp; Analgesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) is committed to improving the quality, safety, and value that cardiothoracic anesthesiologists bring to patient care. To fulfill this mission, the SCA supports the creation of peer-reviewed manuscripts that establish standards, produce guidelines, critically analyze the literature, interpret preexisting guidelines, and allow experts to engage in consensus opinion. The aim of this report, commissioned by the SCA President, is to summarize the distinctions among these publications and describe a novel SCA-supported framework that provides guidance to SCA members for the creation of these publications. The ultimate goal is that through a standardized and transparent process, the SCA will facilitate up-to-date education and implementation of best practices by cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesiologists to improve patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Data Extraction or Charting Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Systematic Reviews Scoping Reviews Meta-analyses and Narrati...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Systematic Reviews Scoping Reviews Meta-analyses and Narrati...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Kertai,

Makkad,

Bollen

et al. 2023

Anesthesia &Amp; Analgesia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a simpler method of categorizing reviews, two categories emerge: narrative or systematic (Agarwal & Dewan, 2016). See Table 1 for the description of narrative and systematic reviews.…”

Section: What Are the Different Types Of Review?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Scholarship Development Series Part I: Writing a Review of the Literature

Cuellar

2019

Hisp Health Care Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As part of National Association of Hispanic Nurses’ Strategic Plan, our organization focuses on the development of scholarship in our members. Scholarship is what moves nursing science forward and includes not only research but also teaching/education and clinical practice. Part of scholarship is identifying what is in the literature or what is the “evidence” which is detrimental to identifying the best practices for our Latino communities. This article is part of a scholarship development series that will run in Hispanic Health Care International. The purpose of this first article is to provide a background on how to conduct a review of the literature. The objectives of the article are to (1) define what a review of the literature is, (2) discuss various types of review articles that can be used for research, practice, or education, (3) identify the process of synthesizing evidence, (4) present standardized formats that can be used in writing a review, and (5) provide steps to begin the process of writing a review.

show abstract

High strength and ductility high-entropy intermetallic matrix composites reinforced with in-situ hierarchical TiB2 particles

Hu,

Dong,

et al. 2024

Composites Part B: Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Writing a review article: Making sense of the jumble

Cited by 6 publications

References 14 publications

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Development and Publication of Clinical Practice Parameters, Reviews, and Meta-analyses: A Report From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Presidential Task Force

Scholarship Development Series Part I: Writing a Review of the Literature

High strength and ductility high-entropy intermetallic matrix composites reinforced with in-situ hierarchical TiB2 particles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About