Writing as Collaboration

Reither, James A.; Vipond, Douglas

doi:10.2307/378091

Cited by 43 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Beyond Rwanda, the seminal studies by Reither and Vipond (1989), Saunders (1989) and Storch (2002) were found to squarely focus on students' self-directed group writing and the patterns of collaboration, the perspective also shared by the present study. All three studies seem to confirm that when students organize group writing by themselves, they are likely to resort to a number of collaborative patterns which give way to different forms of learning.…”

mentioning

confidence: 68%

“…In other words, members from three groups endorsed the responsibility for the group work produced. The critical reviews made by group members among themselves also suggest the workshopping form of collaboration advanced by Reither and Vipond (1989). In terms of Storch's (2002) models of collaborative writing, Group I, III and IV would be assimilated either to the dominant/dominant or expert/novice patterns of collaboration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The third form of collaboration for Reither and Vipond (1989) is knowledge making. This is rather an indirect form of collaboration.…”

Section: Patterns Of Collaboration In Efl Academic Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To understand university students' collaborative work, especially in the area of EFL writing instruction, Reither and Vipond (1989) designed a reflective paper discussing the collaborative nature of producing a research article and how that process could be implemented in an EFL writing classroom. In their paper, the authors outline three forms of collaboration, namely, coauthoring, workshopping and knowledge making.…”

Section: Patterns Of Collaboration In Efl Academic Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

University Students’ Conceptions and Practice of Collaborative Work on Writing

Mutwarasibo

2013

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 68%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The third form of collaboration for Reither and Vipond (1989) is knowledge making. This is rather an indirect form of collaboration.…”

Section: Patterns Of Collaboration In Efl Academic Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Patterns Of Collaboration In Efl Academic Writingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

University Students’ Conceptions and Practice of Collaborative Work on Writing

Mutwarasibo

2013

IJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Collaboration in writing has been drawing an increasing attention in language teaching and assessment (DiCamilla & Anton, 1997; Storch, 2005;Swain & Lapkin, 1998). According to Reither (1989) "thinking of writing as a collaborative process presents more precise ways to consider what writers do when they write, not just with their texts, but also with their language, their personae, and their readers" (p.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting Foreign Language Learners’ Writing: Comparing the Impact of Oral Conferencing and Collaborative Writing

Nosratinia

Nikpanjeh

2015

TPLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This study was an attempt to compare the effect of oral conferencing alongside collaborative writing on writing ability of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. For this purpose, a piloted sample of the Preliminary English Test (PET) was administered to 90 intermediate female EFL learners, between 20 and 32 years old (M age = 26). The results of this test enabled the researchers to select 60 homogenous individuals who were then randomly assigned into two experimental groups of 30 named "oral conferencing group" and "collaborative writing group". To ensure the homogeneity among the participants in terms of their writing ability before the treatment, their scores on the writing section of the PET test were analyzed in isolation and it was considered as the pretest of the study. Oral conferencing included the discussions and negotiations among the participants and the teacher before and after writing activities followed by live teacher-student as well as student-student feedbacks. In the collaborative writing group, the participants wrote compositions in groups based on the same topics introduced in the oral conferencing group. At the end, both experimental groups were given another piloted writing section of the PET test as the posttest. The analysis of the test scores using an independent samples t-test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed that there is a significant difference between the effect of oral conferencing and collaborative writing on EFL learners' writing ability. It was concluded that the ability of EFL learners' writing was more affected by applying oral conferencing rather than collaborative writing.

show abstract

Game Design in Financial Literacy: Exploring Design Patterns for a Collaborative and Inclusive Serious Game from Different Perspectives

Paeßens

Winther

2021

Game-Based Learning Across the Disciplines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Writing as Collaboration

Cited by 43 publications

References 8 publications

University Students’ Conceptions and Practice of Collaborative Work on Writing

University Students’ Conceptions and Practice of Collaborative Work on Writing

Promoting Foreign Language Learners’ Writing: Comparing the Impact of Oral Conferencing and Collaborative Writing

Game Design in Financial Literacy: Exploring Design Patterns for a Collaborative and Inclusive Serious Game from Different Perspectives

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About