2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Ray Burst and Persistent Emission Properties of the Magnetar SGR 1830-0645 in Outburst

Abstract: We report on NICER X-ray monitoring of the magnetar SGR 1830−0645 covering 223 days following its 2020 October outburst, as well as Chandra and radio observations. We present the most accurate spin ephemerides of the source so far: ν = 0.096008680(2) Hz, ν ̇ … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, the rate of hard X-ray bursts from an active magnetar is maximal at the start of an outburst, declining thereafter. This behavior is observed during burst storms, e.g., 1E 2259+596 ) and SGR 1935+2154 (Younes et al 2020), as well as over the course of weeks following the magnetar outburst onset, e.g., SGR 1830−0645 (Younes et al 2022a) and Swift J1818.0−1607 (Hu et al 2020). Hence, if the outburst indeed began at the time of the radio nondetection, more bursts should be detected from the direction of 1E 1547.0 −5408 by Fermi-GBM during the 20 day interval.…”
Section: Short Burst Searchesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, the rate of hard X-ray bursts from an active magnetar is maximal at the start of an outburst, declining thereafter. This behavior is observed during burst storms, e.g., 1E 2259+596 ) and SGR 1935+2154 (Younes et al 2020), as well as over the course of weeks following the magnetar outburst onset, e.g., SGR 1830−0645 (Younes et al 2022a) and Swift J1818.0−1607 (Hu et al 2020). Hence, if the outburst indeed began at the time of the radio nondetection, more bursts should be detected from the direction of 1E 1547.0 −5408 by Fermi-GBM during the 20 day interval.…”
Section: Short Burst Searchesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Generally, pulsed radio emission from magnetars is closely linked to the outburst mechanism: it switches on following the onset of an outburst before gradually fading into radio silence as the neutron star settles into X-ray quiescence (e.g., Camilo et al 2016;Scholz et al 2017; but see Zhu et al 2020;Younes et al 2023). Unlike other radio-loud magnetars, persistent radio pulses have been detected from 1E 1547.0−5408 since the quasi-stabilization of its X-ray flux to the current high state in ∼2013 (Coti Zelati et al 2020;F.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the rate of hard X-ray bursts from an active magnetar is maximal at the start of an outburst, declining thereafter. This behavior is observed during burst storms, e.g., 1E 2259+596 ), SGR 1935+2154 (Younes et al 2020, as well as over the course of weeks following the magnetar outburst onset, e.g., SGR 1830−0645 (Younes et al 2022b), Swift J1818.0−1607 (Hu et al 2020). Hence, if the outburst indeed began at the time of the radio nondetection, more bursts should be detected from the direction of 1E 1547.0−5408 by Fermi-GBM during the 20 day interval.…”
Section: Short Burst Searchesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Both giant flares and short bursts exhibit as impulsive events transpiring on timescales much less than a second. Recent observations favor a very low altitude origin for both short bursts and giant flares, one that involves the neutron star crust such that these events can excite global seismic oscillations [e.g., [530][531][532][533][534][535][536]. If neutron star f-modes are excited in these bursts [537][538][539], third generational gravitational detectors observations of the nearby universe will attain highly constraining levels for magnetar models [540].…”
Section: Pulsars and Magnetarsmentioning
confidence: 99%