2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray luminosities of optically selected cataclysmic variables and application to the Galactic ridge X-ray emission

Abstract: By studying Swift X-ray spectra of an optically-selected, non-magnetic sample of nearby cataclysmic variables (CVs), we show that there is a population with X-ray luminosity much lower than accounted for in existing studies. We find an average 0.5-10.0 keV luminosity of 8 × 10 29 erg s −1 which is an order of magnitude lower than observed in previous samples. Looking at the co-added X-ray spectrum of twenty CVs, we show that the spectral properties of this optically-selected, low X-ray luminosity sample -likel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, while the detailed propeller model of Matthews et al (2007) can still explain WZ Sge, it fails to explain GW Lib, whose outburst properties are similar to those of WZ Sge. On a possibly related note, the X-ray luminosity of WZ Sge is low compared to dwarf novae with frequent outbursts (U Gem and SU UMa types; Byckling et al 2010), while it is higher than that of GW Lib or the Sloanselected systems studied by Reis et al (2013). Given this, future studies should strive to understand why the quiescent accretion rate in WZ Sge is high compared to other WZ Sge systems and not why it is lower than in normal dwarf novae.…”
Section: On the Quiescent Rate Of Accretionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, while the detailed propeller model of Matthews et al (2007) can still explain WZ Sge, it fails to explain GW Lib, whose outburst properties are similar to those of WZ Sge. On a possibly related note, the X-ray luminosity of WZ Sge is low compared to dwarf novae with frequent outbursts (U Gem and SU UMa types; Byckling et al 2010), while it is higher than that of GW Lib or the Sloanselected systems studied by Reis et al (2013). Given this, future studies should strive to understand why the quiescent accretion rate in WZ Sge is high compared to other WZ Sge systems and not why it is lower than in normal dwarf novae.…”
Section: On the Quiescent Rate Of Accretionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The PL component describes the magnetospheric emission while BB or NSA refer to the thermal emission from the NS surface. We also tried the absorbed twotemperature optically thin thermal plasma (mekal) model (Mewe, Gronenschild & van den Oord 1985) which is usually used to describe spectra of cataclysmic variables (CVs) (see, e.g., Baskill et al 2005;Reis et al 2013). The cooler component describes the emission from the unshocked accretion flow and white dwarf photosphere while the hotter one describes the shocked flow emission.…”
Section: X-ray Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also no sign of X-ray reflection, but again, this does not classify the source, since Fe reflection lines were seen in magnetic and non-magnetic CVs. Pretorius et al (2013), Reis et al (2013), Byckling et al (2010), andBaskill et al (2005). Luminosities given in certain spectral bands were corrected with bolometric correction factors using the spectral parameters given in the papers mentioned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 various CV subsamples are shown with well-determined distances, part of those were used to determine the space density and luminosity functions of CVs. Data were taken from Baskill et al (2005); Reis et al (2013); Pretorius & Knigge (2012); Pretorius et al (2013);Byckling et al (2010). Byckling et al (2010) were using a sample of non-magnetic CVs (dwarf novae, to be more precise) with parallax-based distance measurements to constrain the CV luminosity function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation