Yemeni palatal morphology

Al-Zubair, Nabil Muhsen; Al-labani, Mohammed A; Almotareb, Fuad Lutf

doi:10.4103/2278-0521.157866

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Significant gender dimorphism was observed in our study with increased dimension for males, whereas Ahmed et al [ 8 ] found no significant sex differences in respect to palatal length which were in controversy with the findings of Khatiwada et al in 2020 and Al-Zubair et al, who reported longer palates in females when compared to males [ 22 , 29 ].…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Generally, differences in palatal measurements have been encountered in the literature among individuals with respect to growth pattern of facial region, environmental and genetic background, and pathologies such as enlarged tonsils, nasal allergies, or prolonged mouth breathing [ 22 ]. Although controversies were reported by different investigators about gender differences of palatal measurements [ 29 , 43 , 44 ], the findings of the current study displayed higher values in all measured dimensions in males compared to females except palatal depth at molar area and PHI.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

“…Significant gender differences were reported in the palatal width of the present study, which was in agreement with that performed on the Iraqi population by Ahmed et al [ 8 ]. Similarly, gender differences in palatal width were also noted on Yemeni and Jordanian samples by Al-Zubair et al and Mustafa et al [ 29 , 30 ]. Conversely, Klosek et al stated no gender difference in palatal width nor in palatal height [ 31 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%

“…Furthermore, Tsai and Tan demonstrated no gender differences [ 42 ]. On the contrary, Al-Zubair [ 29 ] and Thalider [ 14 ] showed that palatal height in the molar site was greater in females than in males. This contradiction could be attributed to ethnic differences among studied populations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Correlation of Three Dimensions of Palate with Maxillary Arch Form and Perimeter as Predictive Measures for Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hard palate is regarded as an important part of the human skull, which contributes to the separation of the oral and nasal cavities. The aims of the study were to investigate the morphology of the hard palate in order to create a general guideline of three-dimensional values of the palate in a Kurdish sample in the city of Sulaimani as well as determining the possible correlations between different palatal parameters in class I malocclusion with the maxillary arch form and perimeter. A retrospective study design was adopted by collecting 100 study models of orthodontic patients aged 16–24 years old attending different private dental clinics in the city of Sulaimani seeking orthodontic management. In this study, three-dimensional palatal measurements including depth, length, and width were measured in an attempt to discover their correlation with each maxillary arch form and perimeter. Additionally, measurements of inter-molar width, inter-canine width, and arch perimeter were carried out. About two-thirds of those seeking orthodontic treatment were females. Nearly 80% of the study sample had narrow palate followed by 15 and 5% of intermediate palate and broad palate, respectively. In regard to arch form, almost 90% of subjects were with tapered maxillary arch form and 10% of them with oval arch form. Males had increased dimensions compared to females, with significant differences, except in palatal depth in the molar area, and palatine height index, in which females showed increased dimensions than males but the differences were statistically non-significant. A strong positive correlation was observed between arch form and canine depth. In regard to arch perimeter, a strong negative correlation was found with molar depth and a medium positive correlation with each of canine depth, palatal width, and palatal length.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 58%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Correlation of Three Dimensions of Palate with Maxillary Arch Form and Perimeter as Predictive Measures for Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prediction and treatment plans of impacted canines are challenging for orthodontists; many investigations were conducted to correlate this anomaly with craniomaxillofacial structures [24,27,28]. Three-dimensional palate and dental arch perimeter measurements can be used as predictors for maxillary palatal canine impaction [29]. However, this study investigated any possible relationship between three-dimensional palatal measurements and arch perimeter with maxillary canine impaction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Palate and Dental Arch Perimeter as Predictors for Maxillary Palatal Canine Impaction—A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Analysis

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: Accurate diagnosis and treatment plans in orthodontics were facilitated by novel technologies. The prediction of occlusal problems is of utmost importance for clinicians. This present study aimed to find any possible correlation between unilateral and bilateral palatally impacted maxillary canine, palatal dimensions, and maxillary arch perimeter using digital measurements and determine the factors that could be used as predictors for maxillary palatal canine impaction. (2) Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on cone-beam computed tomography images of orthodontic patients aged 15 to 25. Palatal dimensions and maxillary arch perimeter were digitally measured using Materialize Interactive Medical Image Control System. (3) Results: A significant difference was found between the case and the study groups regarding palatal depth, length, and arch perimeter, except for the palatal width. A weak correlation was reported in palatal depth and length with canine impaction, whereas the correlation was moderate concerning the arch perimeter. They can be used as predictors for palatal canine impaction. (4) Conclusion: Palatal dimensions and dental arch perimeter affect maxillary palatal canine impaction. Deficient arch perimeter, palatal depth, and length could be helpful in the prediction of maxillary palatal canine impaction.

show abstract

De-Historicizing (Mainstream) Ottoman Historiography on Tanzimat and Tahdith: Jus Gentium and Pax Britannica Violate Osmanli Sovereignty in Arabia

Al-Kassimi

2021

Histories

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The (secular-humanist) philosophical theology governing (positivist) disciplines such as International Law and International Relations precludes a priori any communicative examination of how the exclusion of Arab-Ottoman jurisprudence is necessary for the ontological coherence of jurisprudent concepts such as society and sovereignty, together with teleological narratives constellating the “Age of Reason” such as modernity and civilization. The exercise of sovereignty by the British Crown—in 19th and 20th century Arabia—consisted of (positivist) legal doctrines comprising “scientific processes” denying Ottoman legal sovereignty, thereby proceeding to “order” societies situated in Dar al-Islam and “detach” Ottoman-Arab subjects from their Ummah. This “rational exercise” of power by the British Crown—mythologizing an unbridgeable epistemological gap between a Latin-European subject as civic and an objectified Ottoman-Arab as despotic—legalized (regulatory) measures referencing ethno/sect-centric paradigms which not only “deported” Ottoman-Arab ijtihad (Eng. legal reasoning and exegetic hermeneutics) from the realm of “international law”, but also rationalized geographic demarcations and demographic alterations across Ottoman-Arab vilayets. Both inter-related disciplines, therefore, affirm an “exclusionary self-image” when dealing with “foreign epistemologies” by transforming “cultural difference” into “legal difference”, thus suing that it is in the protection of jus gentium that “recognized sovereigns” exercise redeeming measures on “Turks”, “Moors”, or “Arabs”. It is precisely the knowledge lost ensuing from such irreflexive “positivist image” that this legal-historical research seeks to deconstruct by moving beyond a myopic analysis claiming Ottoman-Arab ‘Umran (Eng. civilization) as homme malade (i.e., sick man); or that the Caliphate attempted but failed to become reasonable during the 18th and 19th century because it adhered to Arab-Islamic philosophical theology. Therefore, this research commits to deconstructing “mainstream” Ottoman historiography claiming that tanzimat (Eng. reorganization) and tahdith (Eng. modernization) were simply “degenerative periods” affirming the temporal “backwardness” of Ottoman civilization and/or the innate incapacity of its epistemology in furnishing a (modern) civil society.

show abstract

Yemeni palatal morphology

Cited by 5 publications

References 11 publications

Correlation of Three Dimensions of Palate with Maxillary Arch Form and Perimeter as Predictive Measures for Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery

Correlation of Three Dimensions of Palate with Maxillary Arch Form and Perimeter as Predictive Measures for Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery

Three-Dimensional Measurements of the Palate and Dental Arch Perimeter as Predictors for Maxillary Palatal Canine Impaction—A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Analysis

De-Historicizing (Mainstream) Ottoman Historiography on Tanzimat and Tahdith: Jus Gentium and Pax Britannica Violate Osmanli Sovereignty in Arabia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About