2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8335-3_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YOLOv3 Remote Sensing SAR Ship Image Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitation of this model is that its performance is limited when the input images are affected by various climatic conditions. Yash Chaudhary et al [19] proposed a model based on YOLOv2. This model proved that the average precision (AP) score of YOLOv3, which was around 90.25, was comparatively greater than that of YOLOv2, which produced around 90.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of this model is that its performance is limited when the input images are affected by various climatic conditions. Yash Chaudhary et al [19] proposed a model based on YOLOv2. This model proved that the average precision (AP) score of YOLOv3, which was around 90.25, was comparatively greater than that of YOLOv2, which produced around 90.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then channel attention and space attention are combined to re-weight the extracted features, improving the significance of the target features and suppressing the interference of noise, and finally connect them to each layer of the pyramid laterally. Chaudhary et al ( 2021 ) tried to directly apply YOLOv3 (Redmon and Farhadi, 2018 ) to ship detection and achieved some good results. Inspired by YOLO, Zhang and Zhang ( 2019 ) divided the original image into grid regions, and each grid was independently responsible for detecting the target in the region.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary limitation of this methodology is its propensity to induce delays in the process of decisionmaking, particularly in comparison to alternative models. Chaudhary et al [44] presented a YOLOv2-based model. This model demonstrated that YOLOv3's average accuracy (AP) score, which was about 90.25, was significantly higher than YOLOv2's, which generated an AP score of approximately 90.05.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%