2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
237
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
237
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for instance, Koop (2001) and Kneller and Stevens (2006). 4 See Cruz-Cázaresa et al (2013) for an updated review on innovation efficiency studies. Mackensen et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2009;Bai, 2013;Franco and Leoncini, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for instance, Koop (2001) and Kneller and Stevens (2006). 4 See Cruz-Cázaresa et al (2013) for an updated review on innovation efficiency studies. Mackensen et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2009;Bai, 2013;Franco and Leoncini, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision making units (DMUs) of studies on innovation efficiency have been diverse; from firm-level to province-level, even broader to the country-level [10,11,[25][26][27][28][29][30]. Table 1 summarized recent studies of innovation efficiency.…”
Section: Innovation Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the innovation efficiency in this study could be an indicator of how sufficiently firms succeeded in innovation by comparing the input and output for innovation. Studies on innovation used DEA to measure innovation efficiency, as mentioned in Section 2, DEA is determined to be an appropriate method to measure innovation efficiency [10,11,[25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Data Envelopment Analysis and Tobit Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Junju Yue* , yuejunju@163.com, School of Public Administration, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China Patent license per capita C 6 Number of provincial-level results C 7 The added value of sales revenue C 8 The added value of industrial C 9 Low cost price ratio C 10 technological innovation Support capacityB 3 The own scientific research institutions number C 11 Production equipment update rate C 12 Overall labour productivity C 13 Proportion of senior titles C 14 R&D expenditure per capita Research results to production rate C 16 Personnel quality C 17…”
Section: _________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%