2009
DOI: 10.1348/026151008x400472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young people and the media: Special Issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies that examine 2D to 3D transfer of learning over long retention intervals will provide us with important practical and educational information about learning across these different media platforms during toddlerhood. At the same time, these findings provide us with new theoretical information, garnered from highly controlled manipulations, about the developmental course of transfer of learning (DeLoache, Simcock & Marzolf, 2004; Durkin & Blades, 2009; Keates, Graham, Ganea, under review) and the development of representational flexibility (Hayne, 2006). Taking Barnett and Ceci’s (2002) taxonomy of transfer framework into consideration, the present study of transfer of learning from 2D sources allows for specific manipulation of modality (from 2D to 3D), social (media model v experimenter), and temporal context (immediate v. delay).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Studies that examine 2D to 3D transfer of learning over long retention intervals will provide us with important practical and educational information about learning across these different media platforms during toddlerhood. At the same time, these findings provide us with new theoretical information, garnered from highly controlled manipulations, about the developmental course of transfer of learning (DeLoache, Simcock & Marzolf, 2004; Durkin & Blades, 2009; Keates, Graham, Ganea, under review) and the development of representational flexibility (Hayne, 2006). Taking Barnett and Ceci’s (2002) taxonomy of transfer framework into consideration, the present study of transfer of learning from 2D sources allows for specific manipulation of modality (from 2D to 3D), social (media model v experimenter), and temporal context (immediate v. delay).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Studies that examine 2D to 3D transfer of learning provide us with important practical, educational information about learning across these different media platforms. At the same time, these findings will also provide us with new theoretical information, garnered from highly controlled manipulations, about the developmental course of transfer of learning (Durkin & Blades, 2009). Taking Barnett and Ceci’s framework into consideration, studies of transfer of learning from 2D sources allows for specific manipulation of modality (from 2D to 3D and vice versa), physical context (different experimenter, different room), temporal context (immediate v. delay), tasks difficulty (simple v. complex tasks), memory demands (practice, repetition, delay), and perceptual and linguistic cues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although some estimates of scholarly publication have suggested a lack of research into mediated transactions relative to research into person‐to‐person interactions in development (Durkin & Blades, 2009), there has been a surge of research in the past decade comparing infants’ and toddlers’ interactions with and learning from live and screen models. As outlined next, research examining infants’ and toddlers’ learning from screen media has typically focused on studies of visual and auditory perception, symbolic understanding, imitation, and word learning.…”
Section: The First 3 Years: Learning About Screen Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%