Your Brain on Art: Emergent Cortical Dynamics During Aesthetic Experiences

Abstract

The brain response to conceptual art was studied with mobile electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the neural basis of aesthetic experiences. In contrast to most studies of perceptual phenomena, participants were moving and thinking freely as they viewed the exhibit The Boundary of Life is Quietly Crossed by Dario Robleto at the Menil Collection-Houston. The brain activity of over 400 subjects was recorded using dry-electrode and one reference gel-based EEG systems over a period of 3 months. Here, we report initial findings based on the reference system. EEG segments corresponding to each art piece were grouped into one of three classes (complex, moderate, and baseline) based on analysis of a digital image of each piece. Time, frequency, and wavelet features extracted from EEG were used to classify patterns associated with viewing art, and ranked based on their relevance for classification. The maximum classification accuracy was 55% (chance = 33%) with delta and gamma features the most relevant for classification. Functional analysis revealed a significant increase in connection strength in localized brain networks while subjects viewed the most aesthetically pleasing art compared to viewing a blank wall. The direction of signal flow showed early recruitment of broad posterior areas followed by focal anterior activation. Significant differences in the strength of connections were also observed across age and gender. This work provides evidence that EEG, deployed on freely behaving subjects, can detect selective signal flow in neural networks, identify significant differences between subject groups, and report with greater-than-chance accuracy the complexity of a subject's visual percept of aesthetically pleasing art. Our approach, which allows acquisition of neural activity “in action and context,” could lead to understanding of how the brain integrates sensory input and its ongoing internal state to produce the phenomenon which we term aesthetic experience.

Neuroscience of aesthetics

“…This is not necessarily a shortcoming if the research question involves testing for relative differences, but it does become an issue if the presence versus absence of a process must be inferred . Indeed, researchers have recently relied on increasingly fine‐tuned analytic techniques for making inferences about mental processes . With this in mind, we are ready to begin our journey through the extant literature.…”

“…27 Indeed, researchers have recently relied on increasingly fine-tuned analytic techniques for making inferences about mental processes. 28,29 With this in mind, we are ready to begin our journey through the extant literature.…”

Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience

“…How best to sample neurophysiological data over time and "in the field" is a question that will need to be resolved over time (Gramann, Ferris, Gwin, & Makeig, 2014). Mobile EEG has begun to be used in museum studies and innovative approaches to data collection have begun to emerge (Kontson et al, 2015;Tröndle & Tschacher, 2012). Technological issues of sampling and separating signal from noise and theoretical issues of how best to use such technology in a hypothesistesting framework remain, but these methods have great promise.…”

Estudio preliminar de evaluación de la creatividad artística mediante el análisis de señales electroencefalográficas

“…La figura 5 muestra este proceso. Con esta prueba se intenta evaluar la actividad cerebral durante la contemplación de una obra artística (neuroestética), objeto de actual investigación por sí misma como muestran diversos artículos [1,7].…”