2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youtube videos as an educational resource for ventrogluteal injection: A content, reliability and quality analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Video viewing figures need to be interpreted with caution-as the number of views may denote popularity, not necessarily quality [43]. Several authors cite concerns about the quality of publicly available videos with specific examples in clinical skills, injection techniques, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation [8,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video viewing figures need to be interpreted with caution-as the number of views may denote popularity, not necessarily quality [43]. Several authors cite concerns about the quality of publicly available videos with specific examples in clinical skills, injection techniques, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation [8,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por tais razões, existem muitos estudos investigando a qualidade dos vídeos encontrados em quase todos os campos da saúde e da enfermagem no YouTube® (LIU et al, 2019;McNAMEE et al, 2021;ÖZSABAN;BAYRAM;DURGUN, 2021;MARGALLO et al 2023). No entanto, identificou-se a escassez de investigações abordando a qualidade dos vídeos com o propósito de ensinar e/ou demonstrar o procedimento de administração de medicamentos por via IM.…”
Section: Descriptoresunclassified