2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2019)092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ẑ invariants at rational τ

Abstract: Ẑ invariants of 3-manifolds were introduced as series in q = e 2πiτ in order to categorify Witten-Reshetikhin-Turaev invariants corresponding to τ = 1/k. However modularity properties suggest that all roots of unity are on the same footing. The main result of this paper is the expression connecting Reshetikhin-Turaev invariants withẐ invariants for τ ∈ Q. We present the reasoning leading to this conjecture and test it on various 3-manifolds.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the main goal is to extend the resurgent analysis of the analytically continued SU(2) Chern-Simons partition function defined on a family of Brieskorn spheres Σ(2, 3, 6n + 5) where n ∈ Z + and 6n + 5 is prime. We provide supporting evidence to the claims made in [2] on theẐ-invariants introduced in [3] that has already been initiated in various contexts [4,6,7,[25][26][27]. 4 Similar to the discussion in section 3.4 and 3.5 in [2] and [6], We will start with, in section 2, the general partition function for our interested Brieskorn spheres Σ(2, 3, 6n + 5) from the generating function introduced in [3] along with special cases of [5,27].…”
Section: Jhep02(2021)008supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, the main goal is to extend the resurgent analysis of the analytically continued SU(2) Chern-Simons partition function defined on a family of Brieskorn spheres Σ(2, 3, 6n + 5) where n ∈ Z + and 6n + 5 is prime. We provide supporting evidence to the claims made in [2] on theẐ-invariants introduced in [3] that has already been initiated in various contexts [4,6,7,[25][26][27]. 4 Similar to the discussion in section 3.4 and 3.5 in [2] and [6], We will start with, in section 2, the general partition function for our interested Brieskorn spheres Σ(2, 3, 6n + 5) from the generating function introduced in [3] along with special cases of [5,27].…”
Section: Jhep02(2021)008supporting
confidence: 89%
“…. , v 9 }, and edges (1, 2), (2, 3), (1,4), (1,5), (5,6), (6, 7), (7,8), (8,9) along with det M = −1 and CokerM = {0} which remains valid for all types of Brieskorn homology spheres. Now, we first conjecture the following from the ingredients gained from the linking matrix and the generating function eq.…”
Section: Jhep02(2021)008mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…written here in terms of the standard false theta-functions, p (q) at roots of unity, not just the radial limit of it, we were able to reproduce WRT invariant for this manifold from Z. As in [74,75], it would be interesting to study more carefully (and compare) the behavior near q = e 2πiτ , with different rational values of τ ∈ Q.…”
Section: Example: a Tadpole Diagrammentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Note added. While preparing the manuscript, we found that [15] appeared, which overlaps with parts of section 2 of this paper.…”
Section: Jhep02(2021)083mentioning
confidence: 68%