2005
DOI: 10.1049/cce:20050204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ZigBee and Bluetooth: strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the energy consumption of BLE is significantly below that of Bluetooth, other features still make it unsuitable for our purposes (see for example, Mohan et al [8] and Baker [9]). First, BLE is designed for small, local area networks and it is typically set up in star topologies or in one-to-one connections.…”
Section: Zigbee Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the energy consumption of BLE is significantly below that of Bluetooth, other features still make it unsuitable for our purposes (see for example, Mohan et al [8] and Baker [9]). First, BLE is designed for small, local area networks and it is typically set up in star topologies or in one-to-one connections.…”
Section: Zigbee Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, on the wired front, whether electrical or optical, a vehicle designer can adopt any combination of CAN, TTCAN, LIN, TTP, BYTEFLIGHT, FLEXRAY, MOST or IDB-1394 for example with each one deliberately promoting specific advantages for target applications [25]- [30]. On the RF wireless front, a vehicle designer has the option of using standardised technologies such as IEEE 802.11, Bluetooth, UWB or ZigBee for which, based upon the target application, the designer will adopt one based upon which one best fits [31]- [33].…”
Section: A Networking and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an unfortunate trade-off in the fact that Bluetooth is a relatively high-powered transmission protocol and has a limited number of simultaneous connections. A potential alternative in future may be a newly proposed wireless protocol named ZigBee, which has lower data transmission rates than Bluetooth, but is much less power consumptive, which may be ideal for a cell phone logger collecting data from wearable physiological sensors [15,16,4] …”
Section: Zigbeementioning
confidence: 99%